Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

FLAC 24/96 to 16/44.1
post Feb 6 2013, 09:45
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 118
Joined: 16-February 11
Member No.: 88210

I have 24/96 FLAC tracks and I want to dither it to 16/44.1. Will doing so reduce the SQ signicantly, and will it still be "lossless"?

sin(α) = v sound/v object = Mach No.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
post Feb 6 2013, 10:37
Post #2

Group: Members
Posts: 2253
Joined: 31-August 05
Member No.: 24222

provided no conclusive evidence that such formats provided any audible benefit
is hardly even in the conceptual ballpark. The tests found that no one could tell any difference. That doesn't even suggest the possibility of "audible benefit" but rather strongly supports the opposite.

As far as "lossless" goes, the answer is definitely no in terms of the data (it is a one way mapping) but yes in terms of anything one can hear.

Is "SQ" a widely defined abbreviation of something or in-group slang?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th November 2015 - 10:41