Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules

- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service

Reply to this topicStart new topic
[NONSENSICAL BUMPING], From: Ripping Vinyl 192khz 24bit (ID #88788)
post Feb 9 2012, 11:45
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 29
Joined: 29-November 11
From: Australia
Member No.: 95472

QUOTE (navalverde @ May 25 2011, 20:35) *
I had orignially assumed that a higher sampling rate would result in a more accurate copy of an analog signal given the increase in samples per second, yet it seems as you say 44.1khz is more than enough to replicate everything in the 20hz-20khz bandwidth according to Nyquist. This then makes me wonder why we even have 24/192 dacs in the first place except to sell stuff or make use of some psychoacoustical effect of higher frequencies

QUOTE (pdq @ May 25 2011, 22:10) *
I don't know if anyone has mentioned this, but while 16 bits is surely more than adequate for recording vinyl, the same may not be true for 44.1 kHz. Clicks and pops can have frequency content well above 22 kHz, and including the higher frequency content can be useful for their removal. This is not to say that one needs anywhere near 192 kHz, however.

You folks are confusing sampling rate with sound frequency. 192kHz sampling rate simply means that the analog signal is sampled 192,000 times per second. It does not mean that frequencies of up to 192kHz will be recorded - that is intentionally avoided with low-pass filtering because it would be pointless.

This post has been edited by Brod: Feb 9 2012, 11:46
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Feb 14 2012, 01:13
Post #2

Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 11380
Joined: 1-April 04
From: Northern California
Member No.: 13167

The following was sent by the author of this post that has been binned which he flagged through our post reporting:

How exactly was my post nonsensical? I provided useful information in a thread that ranks highly on related google searches (which is how I found the thread)... I don't see how the original post date is relevant at all.

Since he has disabled personal messaging, I have decided to post the following reply for public consumption:

Your post adds nothing helpful to the thread. Rather it merely indicates that you are having trouble following the discussion at hand or you have trouble with some basic concepts related to digital sampling. If this is your way of asking for help in understanding sampling frequency and frequency response, I recommend starting a new discussion so that we may disabuse you.


This post has been edited by greynol: Feb 14 2012, 01:16

Your eyes cannot hear.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th November 2015 - 17:32