Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

LAME 3.93.1 vs 3.90.3
post May 11 2003, 11:51
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 90
Joined: 27-April 03
Member No.: 6233

LAME 3.93.1 using --preset standard -Z: 6,563,619 bytes
LAME 3.90.3 using --alt-preset standard (-Z is default): 6,775,038 bytes

why? is there a quality difference?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
post May 15 2003, 00:50
Post #2

Group: Members
Posts: 483
Joined: 1-December 02
Member No.: 3949

hmm. maybe I am completely wrong, this discussion was long long ago. and if you look at my other post above, I stated by myself, that a regression in quality MIGHT have occured.

This post has been edited by amano: May 15 2003, 01:20
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th November 2015 - 04:27