Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Gone back to CBR
post Dec 30 2011, 05:53
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 1604
Joined: 31-January 04
Member No.: 11664

Well I've had it sort of. Everything these days is too complex. My sansa M250 wont handle vbr mp3 well -stutering / volume issues. I really like this player so im keeping it.

I did some abx tests with recent and lame 3.90. CBR 192 is the minimum acceptable and 224 yields very decent quality on par with V2 ~ V0..
The old encoders (before presets) are very fast too. I settled for -h -b 224

I don't want to keep up with the latest and greatest anymore. VBR , joint stereo .. no more. Just an old version of EAC and lame because it just works.

wavpack 350k -hhj0s0.7cc
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
post Dec 31 2011, 15:28
Post #2

Group: Members
Posts: 454
Joined: 31-March 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 29046

Apologies for being a bit off-topic, but I'm finding it amusing that you-all "really like" these players and think that they are "great little players", when they do not play VBR files, fail to index every 100th file, and shut off if the volume is too high.

The word I'd use to describe such a player would be more like "broken".

This post has been edited by slks: Dec 31 2011, 15:29

Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Dec 31 2011, 15:41
Post #3

Group: Members
Posts: 1054
Joined: 19-November 06
Member No.: 37767

QUOTE (slks @ Dec 31 2011, 09:28) *
The word I'd use to describe such a player would be more like "broken".

Don't lump Sandisk firmware problems in with Rockbox firmware problems.

Creature of habit.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st December 2015 - 05:35