Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

wav vs. celt 0.11.2, I found a difference in synthesizer Pop @64kbps
post Oct 10 2011, 01:47
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 14
Joined: 18-April 11
Member No.: 89900

Hello, Jean-Marc Valin

I Make accurate ABX with Audacity
my result is, I audible the highs are smearing, Compare it self!
Using audioequipments are RME Fireface 800 and audio-technica ATH40fs headphones

Test sample

Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 2)
post Oct 10 2011, 18:31
Post #2

Group: Members
Posts: 1853
Joined: 24-June 02
From: Catalunya(Spain)
Member No.: 2383

64kbps is a low bitrate.

(And I will not even ask how can one do an ABX test in Audacity...)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Oct 10 2011, 18:59
Post #3

Group: Members
Posts: 1651
Joined: 3-January 05
Member No.: 18803


Have You done any resampling in the middle of or after the conversion?. There is a symptom of noise shaping in your celt decoded file.
Also not sure if 0.11.2 will be decodable in future. It will be more safe to wait for final specs of Opus.

0.11.2 works more optimally at 48 kHz.
One should expect acceptable quality at 64 kbps but transparency can be achieved at higher bitrates.

This post has been edited by IgorC: Oct 10 2011, 19:07
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th November 2015 - 15:56