Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

AAC or MP3, which is better above 175k in most samples?
post Jan 26 2011, 16:54
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 27-June 05
Member No.: 22989

lots of device support aac
if aac's quality better than mp3 , I will change format

This post has been edited by misuzu: Jan 26 2011, 16:54
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
post Jan 28 2011, 06:19
Post #2

Group: Members
Posts: 567
Joined: 4-June 02
Member No.: 2220

If OP is using a portable player, I might venture that MP3 could use less battery than AAC and be generally as transparent at 175kbps. Or maybe newer players decode AAC just as easily, depends. I was pretty sure MP3 has lesser requirements to decode, then I'd point towards LAME at -V2 -Y unless size averages start wandering too close to 200kbps, then I guess LAME -V3 is the next recommendation.

"Something bothering you, Mister Spock?"
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th November 2015 - 22:47