Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Is still aoTuV better than CVS?
post Nov 25 2010, 15:56
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 522
Joined: 24-November 08
Member No.: 63072


since aoTuV wasnot almost 2 years updated, I wanted to know if it is still better than latest libVorbis, since I know xiph.org adapt the tunings done by aoyumi I suspect it already has all improvements from aoTuV b5.7. Does still aoTuV perform better?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
post Nov 27 2010, 05:06
Post #2

Group: Members
Posts: 1593
Joined: 24-March 02
From: Revere, MA
Member No.: 1607

More channels as stereo: I think, CVS is better, because CVS has channel coupling, and aotuv 5.7 not.

The CVS version was optimized for 5.1/7.1 channel coupling due to the need for it in Google WebM project so yes you are right there. It implements are lot of very complicated channel coupling modes, which shave the bitrate down substantially.

I think what is planned is the opposite: the next official libvorbis (1.4 version), will integrate latest AoTuV tunings.

That's the plan as far as I know and what has been stated by Xiph. This is usually the case for most releases as long as Aoyumi wants or plans to continue to tune Vorbis.

This post has been edited by HotshotGG: Nov 27 2010, 05:08

College student/IT Assistant
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th November 2015 - 05:11