Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Samples from USB Turntables: Audio-Technica AT-LP120-USB
post Oct 25 2010, 02:40
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 15-July 08
Member No.: 55856

Turntable Details
Audio-Technica AT-LP120-USB
Street Price: $200 (US)
ATP-2 Moving Magnet Cartridge
Direct Drive
Wow and Flutter: <0.2%
S/N: >50dB
Platter: Aluminum
Tracking force: 3.5g
More in turntable guide

Note: Like the Stanton T.92 before it, the AT-LP120-USB was a freebie from the manufacturer. Please call me out on any signs of shilliness.


The Sample Clips
For background on the clips, see the "Preparation" thread.

All samples are FLAC and under 30 seconds.

  • CD LP Peg, Steely Dan, Aja
  • CD LP On the Run, Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon
  • CD LP A Little Bit of Riddim, Michael Franti and Spearhead, All Rebel Rockers
  • CD LP Dum Diddly, The Black Eyed Peas, Monkey Business
  • CD LP Rhiannon, Fleetwood Mac, Self-titled Album (Dusty, scratched and skipping album)

Test Tracks
  • LP Motor running, no record, tonearm at rest
  • LP Ultimate Analogue Test LP, Side A
  • LP Ultimate Analogue Test LP, Side B
  • LP Hi-Fi News (HFN002) Test LP, Side A
  • LP Hi-Fi News (HFN002) Test LP, Side B
  • LP Silent Groove, Ultimate Analogue Test LP, Side B, Track 6

Stanton T.92 USB vs. AT-LP120-USB vs. AT-LP2D-USB (Normalized Samples)

Audio-Technica's USB version of their AT-PL120 did much better on the trackability tests LPs than Stanton's T.92- likely thanks the elliptical stylus tip on its ATP-2 cartridge. However, I couldn't hear the difference between the AT and the Stanton once I normalized the samples.

This tells me three things:
  1. The elliptical stylus tip didn't result in the noticeable improvement I was expecting over the spherical stylus tip on the Stanton T.92.
  2. The point where you can't hear the difference between CD and vinyl is further up the line of turntables.
  3. The extra $100 - $200 between a plastic $100 USB turntable and these DJ turntables didn't buy much in terms of sound quality (well, maybe the proper speed). I can't hear the difference between the $100 AT-LP2D-USB and the $300 Stanton T.92 in a blind test.

Maybe I just don't have the best ears for this. Can anyone else clearly hear the difference between any of these samples (above)?

Overall, it seems like a good value at just under $200. It's a solid at 23.5 pounds, though the plinth is encased in plastic. It has many adjustments, including tonearm height (though I may never use it).

What I really liked is the LP120 just worked out of the box, unlike the Stanton. They offered a recommended tracking force- 3.5 grams. On its first play, I did the three trackability tests on HFN002. I couldn't hear any mistracking.

It started mistracking at +16dB. The +18 track was unplayable.

Talk of the PL120 inevitably draws the comparisons to the SL-1200. I collected a few such conversations. The most significant comparison to me is the difference in price.

An MK5 is going for over $1,000 these days. I don't doubt that the SL-1200 is better in most of the ways described in those threads. But is it really $800 better than the PL120?

A final observation: Normalization is an absolute requirement when using the LP120's A/D converter. Steely Dan peaks at -10.8dB. We talked about this at length already but I think the AT-LP120-USB could be the poster-child of why a pre-ADC adjustable gain would be so useful.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th November 2015 - 17:04