Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Legal proprietary codecs usage on Ubuntu Linux
post Sep 18 2008, 19:26
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 174
Joined: 28-September 06
Member No.: 35705

Gerry Carr has announced on the Canonical Blog that Fluendo and CyberLink will now be selling their multimedia wares through the Canonical Store. Fluendo is the company supporting the development of GStreamer and they sell several proprietary codecs for providing a legal media playback experience on Linux. Among these codecs are Windows Media, MPEG2, and MPEG4. CyberLink on the other hand is selling their PowerDVD software for Ubuntu.

Fluendo's Windows Media and MP3 codecs for GStreamer can be purchased for about $25 USD to enable legal Windows Media Audio, Windows Media Video, Windows Media MMS, Windows Media ASF Demuxer, and MP3 Audio decoding. Their complete codec pack, which adds MPEG2, MPEG4 Part 2, H.264/AVC, MPEG2 Program Stream and Transport Stream, AAC, and MPEG4 ISO costs about $40 USD.

CyberLink's PowerDVD for Linux enables the legal video playback of commercial DVD movies. The Linux version of PowerDVD also has Dolby Digital Audio support as well as for remote controls. This proprietary software will set you back $50 USD as a digital download through the Canonical Shop.

canonical via phoronix
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
post Sep 6 2012, 21:53
Post #2

Group: Members
Posts: 322
Joined: 1-March 11
Member No.: 88621

I could sit down with a pencil and paper and do the calculations to encode and then decode a given set of digital audio samples.. It might take me my entire life to do it for 10 seconds of audio, but it's just doing a lot of math. Using a computing tool to speed up the process does not make doing math patentable.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Sep 6 2012, 22:44
Post #3

Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 3406
Joined: 26-July 02
From: To:
Member No.: 2796

QUOTE (yourlord @ Sep 6 2012, 13:53) *
Using a computing tool to speed up the process does not make doing math patentable.
No, laws make doing math patentable. Laws are not necessarily consistent. Courts resolve the ambiguities that emerge in practice.

1. Attack the argument, not the arguer.
2. Assume good faith.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st December 2015 - 02:28