Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Quick Flac Question (Read 2899 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Quick Flac Question

I encoded a track with EAC (-T "artist=%a" -T "title=%t" -T "album=%g" -T "date=%y" -T "tracknumber=%n" -T "genre=%m" -8 %s) as per Wiki.  I encoded the same track with Foobar2000 -8 (it tells me no other options).

The files seem to differ in size.  Is this becuase of slight differences in the way they encode?  Am I doing something wrong in EAC?

[img=http://img110.imageshack.us/img110/6132/untitled10xt.th.jpg]


Quick Flac Question

Reply #2
But regardless, lossless is lossless, yes?  As long as you see nothing wrong with my EAC command line I'm happy.


Quick Flac Question

Reply #4
yes, the very same.  What's strange is that Foobar will report the bitrate incorrectly for one of them.  there's a 1kbps difference.  Thanks for the help though!

Quick Flac Question

Reply #5
Probably padding and tagging differences.