Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Reply to this topicStart new topic
How good is AAC for archiving? (192 kb/s)
post Jun 9 2002, 02:03
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 5-April 02
From: Guadalajara, Jalisco
Member No.: 1693

I use to archive my music using lastest lame at extreme vbr, but i wanna know how good is aac to archive music as well? 192 is the maximum i would use.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Jun 9 2002, 05:14
Post #2

Rarewares admin

Group: Members
Posts: 7515
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Brazil
Member No.: 81

Using AACenc with -extreme profile, you will get bitrates around that and transparency on 99%+ of the musics.

Even with -normal you will get great quality.



Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Jun 11 2002, 04:30
Post #3

Group: Members
Posts: 1394
Joined: 20-December 01
From: Bellingham, WA
Member No.: 693

yes, i would second that.

through some [non] intensive testing i still haven't been able to abx the source vs. extreme or archive.

and ivan is the man, btw.

Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Jun 11 2002, 06:39
Post #4

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 15-December 01
From: Denmark
Member No.: 655

AAC iis better then mp3 at 192. even if you use dibroms tweakings

just be sure to use lates version of the psytell encoder

Sven Bent - Denmark
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th November 2015 - 20:27