Oggdropxpd V1.6 Released For Testing
Reply #27 – 2002-11-28 00:14:36
I dont think it is shitty, I think john33 give a good example, maybe someone wanted the space there. The new tagging system is MUCH better than before! I didn't mean that the new tagging system is shitty at all, i'm really happy and thankful for the improvements regarding the tagging system. (btw it's still a mystery to me how fast john33 implemented the new tagging system) I just had troubles with it, because it simply doesn't allow space after and before the separators. Personally i think filenames without spaces kind of annoying (hard to read). Since version 1.6 is still in beta stage i just wanted to point out the problem that the example on the tag configuration window is not a good example. There is space before and after the separator, i like it that way, but unfortunately OggDropXP doesn't support it that way, so it's not a good example if the example shows a filename that leads to problems with the tagging feature . To solve the problem the space in the example could just be left out. Or the example could stay as it is and OggDropXP has to be improved, so that the example is a valid filename for the tagging feature. I'd be happy with both, but would definitely prefer the last. It's totally up to john33 ... we'll see what he wants to do! EDIT: Why the hell do i always write OggDropXP instead of OggDropXPd ?
Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one! (Benjamin Franklin)