Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules

- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service

Reply to this topicStart new topic
[TOS #8/trolling] From: Resampler plugin, From Topic ID: 67376
post Jan 28 2013, 15:49
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 20-May 08
From: Marseille
Member No.: 53653

Only want to say great great thanks from France smile.gif

I recently discover this plugin in place of PPHS and I got new pleasure when listening Slow Hand wub.gif

Using Foobar/SOX/ASIO/E-MU 1616m/Class T amplifier/Cabasse SCS loudspeaker & Sennheiser HD650 smile.gif

Again : thx for great work and pleasure you give to all of us

i7 3930K@4.4GHz & 16GB & E-MU 1616m+HD650+Cabasse SCS+Class D
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Jan 28 2013, 17:53
Post #2

Mad Scientist

Group: Developer (Donating)
Posts: 4901
Joined: 24-September 01
Member No.: 13

QUOTE (tharkie @ Jan 28 2013, 15:49) *
I recently discover this plugin in place of PPHS and I got new pleasure when listening Slow Hand wub.gif

Can you actually tell the difference *in a blind test* on a normal signal? If so that's a PPHS bug that should be fixed. But I'd be really surprised if you can...

If you can't, TOS8 applies.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Jan 29 2013, 19:10
Post #3

Group: Members
Posts: 108
Joined: 3-February 11
Member No.: 87877

TOS8 is inapplicable as always... How would he prove that to you? Send a notarized certification that he did ABX the two?

I was told by one of the mods in a similar situation that I cannot say that "In my experience DAC x sounds better than y" because I cannot prove that (my experience that is), but he can say that "both x and y sound the same" because he doesn't have to prove that. This completed with references to almighty wikipedia...
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Jan 29 2013, 19:23
Post #4

Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 5275
Joined: 23-June 06
Member No.: 32180

All members that put forth a statement concerning subjective sound quality, must -- to the best of their ability -- provide objective support for their claims.
What about that “is inapplicable”? Never mind your little dig “as always”, which just demonstrates that you’re holding a grudge over being called out on your own violation. Even without that, this is plain trolling. The meaning of TOS #8 is perfectly clear: people must find a way to prove what they’re saying, or they cannot say it. If you don’t like that, stop posting.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th November 2015 - 13:36