IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Verifying Audio with AccurateRip using CueTools, [TOS #6: moved from General Audio]
dave23
post Jan 26 2013, 12:10
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 20-April 10
Member No.: 80007



I have recently downloaded latest version of CueTools 2.1.4 to verify some audio files in FLAC format and to check if their data is intact and in good condition. Upon verifying I received a following log:

QUOTE
[CUETools log; Date: 1/26/2013 3:44:03 AM; Version: 2.1.4]
[CTDB TOCID: CIRFx5dQ.4N9WDS8jx8WeIEidT8-] disk not present in database.
[AccurateRip ID: 0069c39c-02de274b-c712a80f] found.
Track [ CRC | V2 ] Status
01 [e5a69173|048c8131] (0+0/1) No match
02 [d2428b19|252830d0] (0+0/1) No match
03 [92af99ba|339849be] (0+0/1) No match
04 [4887b5f2|cdcf2da8] (0+0/1) No match
05 [97abdd08|e3d7c2c] (0+0/1) No match
06 [22f3b392|d1bbabc7] (0+0/1) No match
07 [905affcv|08f9b5c4] (0+0/1) No match
08 [fd873178|a5df52fc] (0+0/1) No match
09 [00206fnc|5179ebf4] (0+0/1) No match
10 [56bf0841|fd334179] (0+0/1) No match
11 [fgae2e95|0fb37336] (0+0/1) No match
12 [3345734c|2na4ca0a] (0+0/1) No match
13 [be263042|b62fd35c] (0+0/1) No match
14 [96dacce7|b8d367a2] (0+0/1) No match
15 [343db529|a2b2dd20] (0+0/1) No match
Offsetted by 6:
01 [9f50896b] (1/1) Accurately ripped
02 [cc61bbfb] (1/1) Accurately ripped
03 [1d70d340] (1/1) Accurately ripped
04 [6f18326d] (1/1) Accurately ripped
05 [142dbfb6] (1/1) Accurately ripped
06 [98a66f99] (1/1) Accurately ripped
07 [2b1d62cb] (1/1) Accurately ripped
08 [f8e2d9c3] (1/1) Accurately ripped
09 [c4a8738a] (1/1) Accurately ripped
10 [f243f12b] (1/1) Accurately ripped
11 [8f4e3b39] (1/1) Accurately ripped
12 [26d99438] (1/1) Accurately ripped
13 [b7502f51] (1/1) Accurately ripped
14 [213463a1] (1/1) Accurately ripped
15 [8733fd85] (1/1) Accurately ripped

Track Peak [ CRC32 ] [W/O NULL] [ LOG ]
-- 100.0 [712AEFC8] [7984AD5B]
01 99.7 [97D8BA32] [E9FAD642] CRC32
02 99.7 [11643008] [4CCB1273] CRC32
03 99.7 [35FFA1B8] [4EA83A91] CRC32
04 100.0 [5DF9028A] [754C6D86] CRC32
05 99.5 [B3CE5218] [AB312A47] CRC32
06 99.7 [528EF9EB] [8E130CCA] CRC32
07 99.7 [0CBACCF9] [D0ABE978] CRC32
08 99.7 [2CCF3612] [79421C26] CRC32
09 100.0 [84C1214C] [0ACE65A9] CRC32
10 99.7 [2F03884C] [A2AA1CA0] CRC32
11 99.7 [F1D626C4] [889F1C17] CRC32
12 100.0 [C69E8617] [102120AE] CRC32
13 100.0 [EE8766FF] [F76D9B09] CRC32
14 99.7 [9DE1BB02] [C51F844B] CRC32
15 99.7 [814D8958] [49D220E5] CRC32


I have a few questions:

What's the difference between ARv1 and ARv2?
Do I have my Rip in "No match" which is ARv2 or in "Accurately ripped" section below? If my rip didn't match then what does the "AccurateRip ID" signify?

This post has been edited by dave23: Jan 26 2013, 12:11
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
korth
post Jan 27 2013, 00:20
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 446
Joined: 13-March 11
Member No.: 88969



Your rip matched one database entry out of one ARv1 database entries but at an offset of 6 samples. There were no ARv2 entries. More info about reading the log here.
AccurateRip (Hydrogenaudio wiki page)


--------------------
korth
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dave23
post Jan 27 2013, 14:53
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 20-April 10
Member No.: 80007



QUOTE (korth @ Jan 27 2013, 00:20) *
Your rip matched one database entry out of one ARv1 database entries but at an offset of 6 samples. There were no ARv2 entries. More info about reading the log here.
AccurateRip (Hydrogenaudio wiki page)


Does it mean if I remove 6 samples from the start, it would match the one entry in ARv1 database? I have gone through the link at the end but I don't quite understand the purpose of ARv2 and pressings. Could you please make it little more clear why was ARv2 created?

This post has been edited by dave23: Jan 27 2013, 15:38
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
korth
post Jan 27 2013, 19:12
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 446
Joined: 13-March 11
Member No.: 88969



Your rip (all tracks) matches the only public entry in the database. Offset correction is not necessary but it would be +6 in CUETools.
spoon contributed to the 'Pressings' section of that wiki page and also developed ARv2. In post #7 of this thread, spoon describes pressings. Also elsewhere in that thread and the one at the dbpoweramp forum discuss the development of ARv2.


--------------------
korth
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2014 - 10:53