IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Pathological example of a intersample peak, 11dB, discussion.
Rescator
post Jan 10 2013, 04:36
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 13-January 09
From: Trondheim
Member No.: 65515



Pathological example of a intersample peak that was artificially created:

~0dB peak, ~20dBFS RMS (squarewave), +10.87dB intersample peak, 44.1KHz, 32bit float.

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=98752

Please keep any discussion of the test sample in this tread, rather than where it's simply "stored".


The problem:
If oversampled the true peak is reveal to be almost +11dB.
A DAC would need 11dB headroom (or alternatively ~12dB which equals 2 bits) to handle this wav correctly.

The solution?:
A "quick fix" for a 24bit (or float) audio chain, would be to reduce the volume by 12dB somewhere.
Volume loss can be later compensated by simply increasing the analog volume (the user turning the knob a little higher).

*** The rest is somewhat opinionated. ***


Thoughts:
As such the "bottom 3 bits" of audio could be considered waste-able, 2 bits to handle pathological intersample peaks, + 1 bit due to quantization/noisefloor/dither.
A "24bit" DAC would have no issues, 21bits to use is a lot. Likewise a "20bit" DAC would still have 17bits to use.
Ideally the 11 (or 12) dB volume reduction would be done by the DAC just before the reconstruction stage.

Issues?:
For a 12dB headroom DAC one would need to crank up the playback volume, so such a DAC would sound more quiet than most other DACs.
Noisefloor of the amplifier and other parts of the equipment/audio chain is also an issue.
But even "cheap" gear has around -80dBFS to -100dBFS noisefloor.
Also considering that a normal living room can easily have a +50dB noisefloor, so loosing out on the 12dB or so of the quietest audio is not an issue.

So if taking CD audio as an example, a 12dB adjustment would cause the content in the -96dBFS to -84dBFS range to be lost.
The loss can be avoided by simply passing the 16bit audio as 24bit or 32bit float instead.
Under Windows Vista and Windows 7 and Windows 8 all audio is changed to 32bit so this is a non-issue.

How to avoid intersample peaks on gear without the needed headroom?:
On Windows you can simply make sure that you never raise the volume (in Windows) above -12dBFS (~45% volume),
and instead use the analog volume knob (if there is one on your system or gear) instead.

11dB really?
Yep! Then again this is a pathological example.
"Normally" the intersample peak is within 1dB of the digital peak, and in some rare cases up to 2 to 3dB higher.
If you make/master music, then the final mix/pressing master/encoding/exporting should have 2 or 3dB headroom.
So as long as no peaks go above 3dB you should be pretty darn safe from causing any clicks or distortion for the end user.

The example here is a pure spike, and humans tend not to like to listen to pops, clicks, static, test tones, or similar.
So encountering anything like this "in the wild" is very rare.

Is it really that bad?:
Please remember that intersample peaks do not damage equipment, at least I've never heard or read about such happening, and the CD was invented like ages ago.
So if this was a practical issue we'd have heard about it along time ago as equipment got fried etc. And we'd have had a solution years ago as well.

The only thing it does is damage the audio quality, that is if you actually can hear/notice it at all. You are more likely to hear crackling/distortion from overly compressed music.
And ironically it is that type of overly compressed music that has the most intersample peaks that go above 0dBFS.
Solution? Stop compressing the hell out of music. Use 20dB or more headroom and intersample peaks will most likely never be an issue.



--------------------
"Normality exist in the minds of others, not mine!" - Rescator
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Rescator
post Jan 14 2013, 00:51
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 13-January 09
From: Trondheim
Member No.: 65515



bandpass, 2bdecided, saratoga and John Siau will hopefully find this interesting.


4th post here http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....st&p=820447
has a .CSV with the raw data from a scan.

Here is the highlights:
QUOTE
5824 tracks.
Peak -1.18 dBFS (Min -28.03, Max 0.00)
ISP -0.45 dBFS (Min -28.02, Max 9.54)
ISP/Peak Delta -1.63 dB (Min -56.05, Max 9.54)
RMS -16.89 dBFS (Min -46.18, Max -6.34)

27.59% ISP <-1 dBFS
72.41% ISP >-1 dBFS

44.33% ISP -1 to 0 dBFS
19.95% ISP 0 to 1 dBFS
3.71% ISP 1 to 2 dBFS
0.79% ISP 2 to 3 dBFS
0.21% ISP 3 to 4 dBFS
0.34% ISP 4 to 5 dBFS
0.31% ISP 5 to 6 dBFS
1.56% ISP 6 to 7 dBFS
1.18% ISP 7 to 8 dBFS
0.00% ISP 8 to 9 dBFS
0.02% ISP 9> dBFS


The tracks are of all genres from "typical" to really weird. WAV, FLAC, Mp3, AAC/MP4, Ogg, 44.1KHz & 48KHz, 16 and 24/32bit. Soundtracks, pop, techno, anime, classic, game, computer music, my own composed music, standup, stereo and mono tracks, multi-channel tracks, spanning multiple decades. It took 4+ hours using 6 cores each at 100% (would have taken 24hrs if only one core had been used).

I am really surprised that only around 30% of the tracks is actually below the -1.0 dBFS for "true peaks" that EBU R128 wants.
I am even more surprised to see around 20% in the 0 to +1 dBFS range as that is (in my opinion) a rater high percentage of ISP "overs" to pass to a DAC or a audio chain.
The 3.71% in the +1 to +2 range and the 0.79% in the +2 to +3 range is very worrying, but a DAC like that mentioned by John Siau should handle this fine.

Where it really gets creepy is the >3dBFS ISPs, 3.62% total in the +3 to >+9 dBFS range. Wit the highest ISP at 9.54.
Those are probably really messed up tracks. Stupidly enough I did not also log the filepaths. (I just created the ids) So I can't easily find out what tracks are this bad so easily.
I may rescan everything in the future (maybe with better tools, R128 scan and log tool would be ideal for this stuff) and if the tracks where commercial tracks I'll post which ones (and if it turns out to be my music I'll provide samplers for testing).

Note! I used a intermediary tool that called sox, the tool itself was called/used by foobar2000 as if it was a encoder/converter, 32bit wav audio data was passed to sox, so it's unlikely the very high ISPs detected are corrupted file data, or if it is then foobar2000 treated it as part of the audio, in which case it matches real world situations (playing of corrupted data as audio).

Hopefully you guys find the .csv interesting, 5824 tracks is a rather large sample of data and thus hopefully useful.
Maybe if others could scan and make similar .csv and we can start gathering large amounts of data for numbers crunching (a foobar plugin or a standalone scan tool would make this easier for folks, *hint hint* !).


--------------------
"Normality exist in the minds of others, not mine!" - Rescator
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Rescator   Pathological example of a intersample peak, 11dB, discussion.   Jan 10 2013, 04:36
- - Rescator   http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread....25#po...   Jan 10 2013, 07:51
- - Kees de Visser   At a first glance it seems that this test signal i...   Jan 10 2013, 07:57
- - lvqcl   http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....st...   Jan 10 2013, 15:52
- - 2Bdecided   While we're quoting past debates, I remember o...   Jan 10 2013, 16:06
- - John_Siau   When designing Benchmark's new DAC2 HGC D/A co...   Jan 10 2013, 16:10
|- - saratoga   QUOTE (John_Siau @ Jan 10 2013, 10:10) I ...   Jan 10 2013, 17:07
|- - Rescator   QUOTE (John_Siau @ Jan 10 2013, 16:10) A ...   Jan 11 2013, 11:27
|- - Banned   QUOTE (Rescator @ Jan 11 2013, 11:27) it ...   Jan 12 2013, 12:24
|- - Rescator   QUOTE (Banned @ Jan 12 2013, 12:24) QUOTE...   Jan 12 2013, 13:14
|- - Banned   QUOTE (Rescator @ Jan 12 2013, 13:14) Nic...   Jan 12 2013, 15:54
|- - Rescator   QUOTE (Banned @ Jan 12 2013, 15:54) Examp...   Jan 12 2013, 18:14
|- - Banned   QUOTE (Rescator @ Jan 12 2013, 18:14) QUO...   Jan 12 2013, 20:52
|- - Rescator   QUOTE (Banned @ Jan 12 2013, 20:52) QUOTE...   Jan 12 2013, 22:53
|- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (Rescator @ Jan 12 2013, 21:53) To ...   Jan 14 2013, 12:47
- - bennetng   I've seen +4.8dB intersample peak in a song, b...   Jan 10 2013, 18:19
- - 2Bdecided   I don't see how on-sample values above 0dB FS ...   Jan 10 2013, 19:56
- - bennetng   I just generated another synthetic example wavefor...   Jan 10 2013, 20:26
|- - Rescator   QUOTE (bennetng @ Jan 10 2013, 20:26) I j...   Jan 12 2013, 13:22
|- - bennetng   QUOTE (Rescator @ Jan 12 2013, 20:22) QUO...   Jan 12 2013, 16:36
- - bandpass   $ sox InterSamplePeak.wav -n gain -11.9 stats...   Jan 11 2013, 13:13
- - bandpass   Here's how to do the EBU upsampling/filtering ...   Jan 12 2013, 23:17
|- - Rescator   QUOTE (bandpass @ Jan 12 2013, 23:17) Her...   Jan 12 2013, 23:22
- - Rescator   bandpass, 2bdecided, saratoga and John Siau will h...   Jan 14 2013, 00:51
|- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (Rescator @ Jan 13 2013, 23:51) ban...   Jan 14 2013, 13:00
||- - Rescator   QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Jan 14 2013, 13:00) Ar...   Jan 14 2013, 16:49
||- - bug80   QUOTE (Rescator @ Jan 14 2013, 16:49) QUO...   Feb 4 2013, 12:45
|- - John_Siau   QUOTE (Rescator @ Jan 13 2013, 18:51) ban...   Jan 14 2013, 18:22
- - bandpass   Using LibreOffice (free and available on Windows):   Jan 14 2013, 17:06
- - 2Bdecided   Yep, that's exactly it. (I just used Excel). ...   Jan 14 2013, 17:20
|- - Rescator   (@bandpass Darn you, stop teaching me new tricks. ...   Jan 14 2013, 20:29
|- - bandpass   QUOTE (Rescator @ Jan 14 2013, 19:29) if ...   Jan 15 2013, 09:57
- - John_Siau   The "+11 dB" test signal (that started t...   Jan 14 2013, 18:40
|- - Rescator   QUOTE (John_Siau @ Jan 14 2013, 18:40) Th...   Jan 14 2013, 19:37
- - Wombat   After reading about that topic a bit i found that ...   Jan 14 2013, 22:31
|- - Alexey Lukin   QUOTE (Wombat @ Jan 14 2013, 17:31) After...   Feb 4 2013, 19:49
- - knutinh   Since inter-sample overshoot is a problem for the ...   Feb 4 2013, 09:20
|- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (knutinh @ Feb 4 2013, 08:20) Since...   Feb 4 2013, 13:08
|- - knutinh   QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Feb 4 2013, 13:08) QUO...   Mar 4 2013, 13:58
|- - John_Siau   QUOTE (knutinh @ Mar 4 2013, 07:58) I vag...   Mar 4 2013, 17:51
|- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (knutinh @ Mar 4 2013, 12:58) I vag...   Mar 4 2013, 18:21
- - John_Siau   QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Feb 4 2013, 07:08) QUO...   Feb 4 2013, 18:08


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2014 - 07:16