IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Please update opus-tools binaries at Rarewares
Dukers
post Dec 11 2012, 11:17
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 29-July 07
Member No.: 45724



Please update opus-tools with version 0.1.6/libopus 1.0.2. If possible backport flac input support added in commit 892fd929 just after 0.1.6.

http://rarewares.org/opus.php
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
[JAZ]
post Dec 12 2012, 20:04
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 1751
Joined: 24-June 02
From: Catalunya(Spain)
Member No.: 2383



@saratoga: Your advice might be true, but definitely does not solve the problem.

@NullC: Do you need to re-read the three clauses of the BSD License, in which you are distributing the specification, the reference implementation and the "revised implementation"? (whatever that is)

Reading your post I really wondered if you were regretting releasing the code as open source. Does that really do a favour to the codec image?

Do you really think that Opus is that much different than LAME or Vorbis? Do you realize that here at hydrogenaudio, people have modified and improved the original implementations, making changes that have moved the codec to new standards? ( Original Dibrom tunings that created alt presets on LAME, Garf Vorbis tunings, aotuv Vorbis tunings, and recently halb27 tunings on LAME VBR).

Do you really have a reason to (almost) censor the curiosity and testing intentions of the people over here? Have we made and explicit recommendation to use builds from here against the official build?

As jensend has tried to explain to you, if anything, there's a communication problem over here between you and us. Not the builds.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
saratoga
post Dec 12 2012, 20:26
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 4844
Joined: 2-September 02
Member No.: 3264



QUOTE ([JAZ] @ Dec 12 2012, 15:04) *

@saratoga: Your advice might be true, but definitely does not solve the problem.


What exactly is the problem are you expecting me to solve?

QUOTE ([JAZ] @ Dec 12 2012, 15:04) *

@NullC: Do you need to re-read the three clauses of the BSD License, in which you are distributing the specification, the reference implementation and the "revised implementation"? (whatever that is)


Why would someone need to re-read the BSD license exactly? This question doesn't really make sense.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
[JAZ]
post Dec 13 2012, 00:04
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 1751
Joined: 24-June 02
From: Catalunya(Spain)
Member No.: 2383



QUOTE (saratoga @ Dec 12 2012, 20:26) *
What exactly is the problem are you expecting me to solve?

You told a person that wanted to solve a problem (NullC being angry because HydrogenAudio distributed binaries of Opus directly from the git repository), to shut up because he wasn't helping. (More or less).

QUOTE (saratoga @ Dec 12 2012, 20:26) *
Why would someone need to re-read the BSD license exactly? This question doesn't really make sense.


Do you need to re-read it too?

CODE
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
...
Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.


There is no restriction on who can build that binary, there is no restriction on distributing that binary, and, obviously, there is no restriction in telling other people about the binary.


That's why I ended the post saying that If he's open to talk about it, we might find a common point that we can both agree. As it is, it gives a bad looking for an open source project to limit what you can do with the source (more so being BSD license, not GPL).

Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Dukers   Please update opus-tools binaries at Rarewares   Dec 11 2012, 11:17
- - Gainless   Opus-Tools 0.1.6? There's just 0.1.5 on the of...   Dec 11 2012, 12:29
|- - Nekit1234007   QUOTE (Gainless @ Dec 11 2012, 15:29) Opu...   Dec 11 2012, 12:30
- - Gainless   Would be good to have this as a package in the off...   Dec 11 2012, 12:36
- - john33   I'll try to get this done by the end of the we...   Dec 11 2012, 15:18
- - NullC   The FLAC support isn't released yet because it...   Dec 11 2012, 15:22
|- - jensend   QUOTE (NullC @ Dec 11 2012, 07:22) I...   Dec 11 2012, 18:52
|- - NullC   QUOTE (jensend @ Dec 11 2012, 10:52) But ...   Dec 11 2012, 19:31
|- - jensend   QUOTE (NullC @ Dec 11 2012, 11:31) I can ...   Dec 12 2012, 00:46
|- - saratoga   QUOTE (jensend @ Dec 11 2012, 19:46) QUOT...   Dec 12 2012, 01:41
- - Dukers   OK. No flac input for now. We can wait a couple of...   Dec 11 2012, 22:54
- - [JAZ]   @saratoga: Your advice might be true, but definite...   Dec 12 2012, 20:04
|- - saratoga   QUOTE ([JAZ] @ Dec 12 2012, 15:04...   Dec 12 2012, 20:26
|- - [JAZ]   QUOTE (saratoga @ Dec 12 2012, 20:26) Wha...   Dec 13 2012, 00:04
|- - DonP   QUOTE ([JAZ] @ Dec 12 2012, 18:04...   Dec 13 2012, 01:18
- - jensend   NullC isn't trying to tell people that they ha...   Dec 13 2012, 06:11
- - john33   Here is a build of Opus Tools 0.1.6. This is curre...   Dec 13 2012, 13:22
|- - Nekit1234007   john33, ahemů CODE.\opusenc -V opusenc opus-t...   Dec 13 2012, 13:35
|- - lvqcl   QUOTE (john33 @ Dec 13 2012, 16:22) In or...   Dec 13 2012, 16:10
|- - john33   QUOTE (lvqcl @ Dec 13 2012, 15:10) QUOTE ...   Dec 13 2012, 17:22
- - john33   Oops! Re-compiled and uploaded on same link wi...   Dec 13 2012, 15:05
|- - Nekit1234007   QUOTE (john33 @ Dec 13 2012, 18:05) Oops...   Dec 13 2012, 15:13
- - john33   I've just added an ICL12.1 Win32 SSE2 compile ...   Dec 13 2012, 18:29
- - Dukers   Thanks, john33.   Dec 13 2012, 23:52
- - Bostedclog   Please be gentle .But this latest opus release.D...   Dec 14 2012, 14:30


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd July 2014 - 15:08