IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Loudness/Mastering (Mark Waldrep)
DVDdoug
post Nov 16 2012, 10:39
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 2588
Joined: 24-August 07
From: Silicon Valley
Member No.: 46454



Recording Magazine, December 2012, FadeOut column, To Master, Or Not To Master, That Is The Question

Ex-Mastering Engineer writes a editorial... Here are some excerpts:
QUOTE
Back in 1989 I started my own mastering business...

...working on the CD & DVD of Bad Company's Merchant's of Cool... We crafted a great sounding record and then sent it to the record company for approval. It was rejected 5 times because they claimed it wasn't loud enough. After repeated applications of increasingly harsh dynamics compression, they were happy. That's when I stopped being a mastering engineer.

...In 2000 I started AIX records... Our Tracks are recorded during a single session in a live reverberant hall... and left unprocessed... no overdubs, no EQ, no compressed dynamics and no artificial reverb.

... Recently... When I listened to... CD tracks as mastered by a "Grammy-nominated" mastering engineer, I was shocked... lifeless, flat, and completely sterile... I called the manager and offered to remix the stereo tracks... I would only send an invoice if the client chose to replace the original tracks with mine... When the artist and manager heard the tracks I had remixed and didn't master, their jaws dropped. "How could we have spent so much money on a 'Grammy-nominated' engineer and gotten such harsh sound."


Mark Waldrep's company is aixrecords.com and iTrax.com. (AFAIK, the article is only NOT available free online.)



Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
C.R.Helmrich
post Nov 16 2012, 20:35
Post #2





Group: Developer
Posts: 686
Joined: 6-December 08
From: Erlangen Germany
Member No.: 64012



Interesting quotes. I met Mr. Waldrep at a conference of the Audio Engineering Society back in 2007. You don't find many producers/masterers who attend scientific conferences, so I give him credit for that. I wish there were more people like him, and less people who e.g. claim that lossless decodings sound different than the sources from which they were made.

(I have to say, though, that I don't mind a bit of compression/limiting).

Chris

This post has been edited by C.R.Helmrich: Nov 16 2012, 20:38


--------------------
If I don't reply to your reply, it means I agree with you.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th September 2014 - 10:19