IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Removing frequencies for low bitrate transcoding
subinbar
post Oct 14 2012, 06:08
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 29
Joined: 10-June 11
Member No.: 91381



Would it be effective to remove certain frequencies from an audio file in order to make it more compressible?

I am currently encoding some of my movies to a portable format, and I'm looking to save space where I can. I'd like to transcode the audio tracks at 32-48kbs with QuickTime HEv1 AAC. (Of course I'd like to use Opus, but compatibility is basically non existent.)

I've done some listening tests with QuickTime vs FhG HE, and my conclusion is that I prefer QuickTime. QuickTime seems to include more high frequencies, while FhG seems to eliminate more. However sometimes I believe QuickTime includes too many (or too high) frequencies that are not able to fit into such small bandwidth, resulting in that "underwater" flanging type sound, similar to low bitrate mp3's. It usually happens with sudden high sounds, such as crashing or cymbals in music.

At these low bitrates it looks like QuickTime applies a hard low-pass at about 15khz.

I'm wondering if I can identify the specific frequency range(s) that these artifacts occur in, and remove or lessen this range, if it will help lessen these resulting artifacts and lessen the complexity of the audio. Similar to de-noising a video clip.

Is this a sound theory, or would removing these frequencies do nothing to reduce the complexity of the audio, and therefore the bitrate requirements? Am I better off reducing the bit-depth instead? In my sound tests, this seemed less effective and made the audio sound too dull.

Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
subinbar
post Oct 15 2012, 09:40
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 29
Joined: 10-June 11
Member No.: 91381



QUOTE (C.R.Helmrich @ Oct 15 2012, 10:26) *
QUOTE (subinbar @ Oct 15 2012, 02:33) *
VBR + HE v1. I haven't done much with HEv2; was never really impressed by it.

VBR 1 is fixed to HEv2. If you don't like the stereo artifacts, I suggest you try CBR at 44 or 48 kbps. At least one of those should give you "true" non-parametric stereo.

Chris


Oh, I thought since the bitrate varied it was VBR... I will give that a shot and see how it sounds. Thanks!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th July 2014 - 23:40