IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

32-bit support, Split from: "The Future of FLAC"
Brand
post Aug 31 2012, 22:21
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 321
Joined: 27-November 09
Member No.: 75355



QUOTE (yourlord @ Aug 31 2012, 21:26) *
32-bit support

QUOTE (sshd @ Aug 31 2012, 22:16) *
>2G support

Both of these are important.

I was glad to see that in audio editing/music making software FLAC gained a lot of support in the last couple of years. I'd say right now most support at least importing FLAC.
But 32bit float is used a lot in audio editing, so FLAC could definitely improve there.


EDIT:
Also, I remember reading once that FLAC is too loosely defined (compared to ALAC where the rules are more strict regarding number of channels etc.). Don't know much about that stuff myself, but if it's true it's worth looking into. Hardware/software manufacturers want a reliable standard to work with.
EDIT2: found it

This post has been edited by Brand: Aug 31 2012, 22:31
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
db1989
post Sep 1 2012, 10:46
Post #2





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 5275
Joined: 23-June 06
Member No.: 32180



QUOTE (smok3 @ Sep 1 2012, 10:28) *
it is open source right?

So no need to ask questions, just fork it under a new name "flac2", make a nice page on what it can do and what is planned to do […] A nice hi-def picture of Josh holding a cigar with a title: "He knows audio" should also be considered
Flac HD
They won’t be able to stop themselves throwing money at you.

In seriousness, I wonder whether LithosZA is correct that there’s little point in supporting very high bit-depths and sampling rates. Josh already noted that the main utility (not necessarily use, thanks to the pyrite-ears community; rather, usefulness) of such parameters is in editing/engineering, and while I can conceive of a scenario in which one wants to backup a project without having its uncompressed files take up so much space, I wonder whether that really needs to be a concern or at least a priority. But then again, would it be relatively trivial to add it and keep everyone happy?

This post has been edited by db1989: Sep 1 2012, 10:50
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th December 2014 - 04:30