IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
AccurateRip question, understanding results
AliceWonder
post Aug 1 2012, 22:13
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 119
Joined: 13-July 12
From: California
Member No.: 101393



CODE
AccurateRip URL http://www.accuraterip.com/accuraterip/5/f/4/dBAR-009-000f14f5-006c8f37-6409b909.bin
18 AccurateRip reponses found
Track  0: unknown          (not tracked)          
Track  1: rip accurate     (confidence  51 of 191) [f5562466], DB [f5562466]
Track  2: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 189) [c2913230], DB [c2913230]
Track  3: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 188) [bfddbede], DB [bfddbede]
Track  4: rip accurate     (confidence  51 of 187) [5173a8dd], DB [5173a8dd]
Track  5: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 190) [2e31e9f4], DB [2e31e9f4]
Track  6: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 190) [3f0562f7], DB [3f0562f7]
Track  7: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 188) [da8829ce], DB [da8829ce]
Track  8: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 188) [1b85d89e], DB [1b85d89e]
Track  9: rip accurate     (confidence  44 of 180) [3f13c1a2], DB [3f13c1a2]


Am I to understand that the reason why the rip is accurate when the confidence is ~ < 25% on each track is because there are large number with same checksum and there are probably more than one CD with same identification? IE maybe a different pressing of same CD?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
greynol
post Aug 1 2012, 22:14
Post #2





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 10253
Joined: 1-April 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 13167



Bingo!


--------------------
Your eyes cannot hear.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JunkieXL
post Aug 2 2012, 00:43
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 359
Joined: 3-April 05
Member No.: 21165



Yes and yes. The number on the left is the amount of matching checksums that have been reported to accurate rip.

There is usually a much lower amount of reported checksums to compare on most releases. A confidence of 1 of 1 or 1 of 2 is usually enough for me to feel confident with its accuracy.
JXL

This post has been edited by JunkieXL: Aug 2 2012, 00:44
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th November 2014 - 09:37