Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Is LAME (3.99.4) meant to give “bitstream problem” decoding freeformat
post Jul 1 2012, 05:24
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 1995
Joined: 30-November 06
Member No.: 38207

Edit: This is FREEFORMAT, and that was supposed to be in the topic, which was truncated upon posting. Oh well.

Was just playing around with freeformat (yeah I know it's practically useless), and encoded (using the same LAME version) freeformat files of various bitrates from 128 to 640. Decoding yields the output 'bitstream problem, resyncing skipping [xxx] bytes', where xxx = 2088 for the 640. Is it supposed to do so?

By the way, freeformat encoding isn't supposed to write headers, right? So it cannot be that it skips some odd header bits?

This post has been edited by Porcus: Jul 1 2012, 05:26

One day in the Year of the Fox came a time remembered well
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
post Jul 1 2012, 13:17
Post #2

Group: Developer
Posts: 3463
Joined: 2-December 07
Member No.: 49183

So it cannot be that it skips some odd header bits?

IMHO it skips the first frame that contains LAME header.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th December 2014 - 22:17