IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Are high sample rates better for DSP?
Ethan Winer
post Jun 10 2012, 20:13
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 248
Joined: 12-May 09
From: New Milford, CT
Member No.: 69730



I've read many times that audio plug-ins such as equalizers work better at higher sample rates, even if audio generally doesn't benefit. It seems unlikely that there's a practical advantage to up-sampling all your files, or recording at 96 KHz in the first place, but is there a potential theoretical improvement? Or is this just another Internet myth?

--Ethan


--------------------
I believe in Truth, Justice, and the Scientific Method
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
greynol
post Jun 12 2012, 17:59
Post #2





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 10339
Joined: 1-April 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 13167



I know the unofficial mantra around here is all things sound the same unless proven otherwise, but all I can say is wow, just wow. When I was an engineer we always joked about something working on an infinite sample of one.

You've tested a couple of DSP operations on extremely trivial single-tone samples and are now willing to make such a sweeping generalization?!? I hope you don't plan on presenting this in public as things might get more than a little embarrassing for you. smile.gif

This post has been edited by greynol: Jun 12 2012, 18:48


--------------------
Your eyes cannot hear.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ethan Winer
post Jun 12 2012, 19:35
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 248
Joined: 12-May 09
From: New Milford, CT
Member No.: 69730



QUOTE (greynol @ Jun 12 2012, 12:59) *
You've tested a couple of DSP operations on extremely trivial single-tone samples and are now willing to make such a sweeping generalization?!?

No plans to present this in public. I posted this question because a friend asked me about it and I wasn't sure, so I figured I'd ask the experts. Me, I'll be satisfied to hear a good explanation of why EQ works better on 96 KHz audio files than files at 44.1 KHz. I'll be even happier to see an FFT or other data, or even a pair of audio files to compare. Whaddya got? biggrin.gif

--Ethan


--------------------
I believe in Truth, Justice, and the Scientific Method
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Ethan Winer   Are high sample rates better for DSP?   Jun 10 2012, 20:13
- - knutinh   The higher the sample-rate, the better any approxi...   Jun 10 2012, 20:46
- - lvqcl   Here is an example of such filter (with explanatio...   Jun 10 2012, 20:56
- - benski   Yes, many filters work better with higher sampling...   Jun 10 2012, 21:17
|- - Ethan Winer   QUOTE (knutinh @ Jun 10 2012, 15:46) The ...   Jun 11 2012, 17:18
|- - saratoga   If your software is good, it should be upsampling ...   Jun 11 2012, 17:53
|- - drewfx   QUOTE (Ethan Winer @ Jun 11 2012, 12:18) ...   Jun 11 2012, 19:11
|- - Ethan Winer   QUOTE (saratoga @ Jun 11 2012, 12:53) If ...   Jun 12 2012, 17:46
|- - extrabigmehdi   QUOTE (Ethan Winer @ Jun 12 2012, 16:46) ...   Jun 12 2012, 18:15
- - xnor   Many EQs use simple bilinear-transformed filters (...   Jun 11 2012, 01:37
- - Woodinville   In addition to the warping one sees in a bilinear ...   Jun 11 2012, 01:46
- - extrabigmehdi   That's interesting, so basically if you want ...   Jun 11 2012, 02:30
- - bandpass   QUOTE (knutinh @ Jun 10 2012, 20:46) The ...   Jun 11 2012, 08:00
|- - knutinh   QUOTE (bandpass @ Jun 11 2012, 09:00) Tru...   Jun 11 2012, 08:30
- - bandpass   From a practical perspective, a particular effect/...   Jun 11 2012, 09:59
|- - knutinh   QUOTE (bandpass @ Jun 11 2012, 10:59) ......   Jun 11 2012, 11:55
- - greynol   I know the unofficial mantra around here is all th...   Jun 12 2012, 17:59
|- - Ethan Winer   QUOTE (greynol @ Jun 12 2012, 12:59) You...   Jun 12 2012, 19:35
|- - drewfx   QUOTE (Ethan Winer @ Jun 12 2012, 14:35) ...   Jun 12 2012, 20:29
|- - saratoga   QUOTE (Ethan Winer @ Jun 12 2012, 14:35) ...   Jun 12 2012, 21:12
|- - Ethan Winer   Thanks Drew for some hard evidence. Can you explai...   Jun 12 2012, 22:46
||- - benski   It's mostly that the shape (aka Q) is going to...   Jun 12 2012, 23:39
||- - drewfx   QUOTE (Ethan Winer @ Jun 12 2012, 17:46) ...   Jun 13 2012, 01:52
||- - andy o   I'm guessing these are the reasons why A/V rec...   Jun 13 2012, 03:27
|||- - Arnold B. Krueger   QUOTE (andy o @ Jun 12 2012, 22:27) I...   Jun 25 2012, 13:10
|||- - Woodinville   QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Jun 25 2012, 05...   Jun 27 2012, 21:59
||- - Ethan Winer   QUOTE (drewfx @ Jun 12 2012, 20:52) The 1...   Jun 13 2012, 19:55
|- - Woodinville   QUOTE (saratoga @ Jun 12 2012, 13:12) QUO...   Jun 13 2012, 01:22
- - greynol   Have you read the responses to your topic? I want...   Jun 12 2012, 19:42
- - greynol   As for the "it's best to record at 96kHz ...   Jun 13 2012, 00:53


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th December 2014 - 09:31