IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Babyface vs USBpre2? (For preamp quality, etc)
Sauve Premis
post May 13 2012, 19:45
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 13-May 12
Member No.: 99799



Hey all.

I keep hearing that the two 'best' interfaces in the mid price range are the RME babyface and the SD USBPre2. My question is, hwo do they compare to each other? I know the babyface offers a LOT more channels, plus MIDI, whilst the USBPre2 only offers 2 channels and no midi. From a UK standpoint, the USBPre2 is also nearly 100 more expensive than the babyface.

Seeing as the babyface seems to win in connectivity features, how do they compare for sheer quality? The SD unit looks a lot more well built, but how about it's A/D D/A converters and preamps? Do they blow the babyface's out of water, or is it so close that they might as well as be even? How about the latency?

Was just wondering as I'm going to drop the ball on either one shortly, but I have no idea which one I should go for (I'm basically looking for pure quality, doubt I'd need more than 2 channels anyway, although it IS nice to have them there).


The only main thing I have seen against the USBPre2 so far is:

QUOTE
I cannot recommend this interface for Windows users at the current time, due to the issues noted above and some intermittent cyclic sample rate issues. (You can hear what that sounds like here: http://www.2shared.com/file/9CyrgcFH/usbp2_test01.html) I've tested this on multiple machines, and even my new box after a reformat.

No one from the SD forums has replied to my concerns since August, and I guess I'm going to go back to email support to see if I can get this figured out... If not I guess I will be selling this unit and getting an RME babyface.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Brand
post May 14 2012, 16:25
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 317
Joined: 27-November 09
Member No.: 75355



Works fine for me. Try viewing it with Flash disabled.

Here's another one:
http://html.midifan.com/review/babyface/[M...alog%202448.htm
Shows worse noise/crosstalk performance (maybe because the SR is different), but the low freq roll off is the same.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Arnold B. Kruege...
post May 14 2012, 22:33
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 3797
Joined: 29-October 08
From: USA, 48236
Member No.: 61311



QUOTE (Brand @ May 14 2012, 11:25) *
Works fine for me. Try viewing it with Flash disabled.

Here's another one:
http://html.midifan.com/review/babyface/[M...alog%202448.htm
Shows worse noise/crosstalk performance (maybe because the SR is different), but the low freq roll off is the same.



The gentle roll off below 50 Hz isn't all that serious of a problem from an audibility viewpoint.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd September 2014 - 01:23