IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Which filter artifacts can be eliminated without trade-off?, (in a universe where computing power comes free)
googlebot
post Apr 3 2012, 08:04
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 698
Joined: 6-March 10
Member No.: 78779



I'm learning, please correct any of the following sentences, if the aren't correct:

  1. We cannot eliminate ringing, just choose where we want it (pre-, post-).
  2. We can minimize ripple by computing power (choice of windowing function) without quality trade-off.
  3. Aliasing in resamplers can eventually only be controlled by passband width and filter steepness (dependency to 1).


If 3 is true, why does the SoX offer a dedicated "allow aliasing" option besides bandwidth and steepness?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
2Bdecided
post Apr 3 2012, 12:13
Post #2


ReplayGain developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 5177
Joined: 5-November 01
From: Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 409



QUOTE (googlebot @ Apr 3 2012, 08:04) *
[*]We cannot eliminate ringing, just choose where we want it (pre-, post-).
Well, you can reduce it by having a more gentle roll off. That's probably stating the obvious though.

It doesn't need to introduce more aliasing - it can sacrifice more of the frequencies below Nyquist.

You may find this thread interesting...
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=68524

Cheers,
David.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th October 2014 - 14:03