IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules

- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service

[TOS #8,#12] From: ...no point to distributing music in 24 bit/192 kHz, From Topic ID: 93853
forart.eu
post Mar 15 2012, 08:17
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 10-December 09
From: italy
Member No.: 75798



Just a note: it has been scientifically proven that sounds are not perceived only through ears...

Anyway, in our case, bit depth is *mutch* more important than frequency IMHO.

This post has been edited by forart.eu: Mar 15 2012, 08:19
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
forart.eu
post Mar 15 2012, 14:25
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 10-December 09
From: italy
Member No.: 75798



QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Mar 15 2012, 10:46) *
Do you remember the 10th of December 2009? It was the day you joined the wrong forum. wink.gif

For your knowledge, i joined this forum before you on 2nd October 2001 mate. huh.gif

QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Mar 15 2012, 10:46) *
Seriously, it's pretty trivial to ABX the feeling of the floor vibrating beneath your feet as you play a deep bass line.

It was just an example.

So you're substantially claiming that non-ABXable lossy-encoded sound is equal to a lossless one ?

If true, than what's the meaning of lossless encoders ?


BTW - once again - my position is that we don't need more Hz, but we need more bits !



This post has been edited by forart.eu: Mar 15 2012, 14:37
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SebastianG
post Mar 15 2012, 15:23
Post #3





Group: Developer
Posts: 1318
Joined: 20-March 04
From: Göttingen (DE)
Member No.: 12875



QUOTE (forart.eu @ Mar 15 2012, 14:25) *
BTW - once again - my position is that we don't need more Hz, but we need more bits !
http://www.joelstrait.com/blog/2009/10/12/..._per_sample.png

I don't see how these pictures support your position. As Monty said already in his article: Pictures can be deceiving. You seem to lack an understanding of how and why dithering works. Go back to Monty's article and read it again.

This post has been edited by db1989: Mar 15 2012, 20:32
Reason for edit: demoting image to link
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st October 2014 - 21:07