IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> foobar2000 General Forum Rules

This is NOT a tech support forum.
Tech support questions go to foobar2000 Tech Support forum instead.

See also: Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service.

Personal note of praise for foobar2000, Was “Oh.” (mega TOS #6)
Hatsumei
post Feb 19 2012, 05:06
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 19-February 12
Member No.: 97246



I just wanted to note my awe at the transcendent beauty of this program. Whoever programmed this is a god, I do believe. The interface is so streamlined and simple, yet with every feature a casual listener (or perhaps even a developer) would want or need. It is, IMO, legitimately better than any other media player I've come across, including commercial-based ones, such as ITunes or Windows Media Player.

Also, out of curiosity, how was this implemented? In what language?
What an inane question. I checked the SDK, C++, obviously.


This post has been edited by Hatsumei: Feb 19 2012, 05:20
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
kraut
post Feb 19 2012, 22:51
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 227
Joined: 24-November 10
Member No.: 85965



QUOTE
Bullshit, Winamp has just as much customization >_>.


party pooper.

I had tried winamp for almost a year - I repeat, no comparison at all to foobar.
Winamp crashed on me regularly without even trying third party plugins. Foobar hardly ever crashed on me with those included. Without them - perfectly stable.
Run foobar for over two years now, added functionality with components, vst plugins etc., just haven't yet dared to look under the hood. Scripting capabilities elude me.

This post has been edited by kraut: Feb 19 2012, 22:58
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd September 2014 - 14:40