Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

LAME 3.93.1 vs 3.90.3
post May 11 2003, 11:51
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 90
Joined: 27-April 03
Member No.: 6233

LAME 3.93.1 using --preset standard -Z: 6,563,619 bytes
LAME 3.90.3 using --alt-preset standard (-Z is default): 6,775,038 bytes

why? is there a quality difference?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
post May 12 2003, 20:56
Post #2

Group: Members
Posts: 483
Joined: 1-December 02
Member No.: 3949

QUOTE (Echizen @ May 11 2003 - 09:18 AM)
Hm... the presets are optimized for 3.90.2 and because of different routines 3.93.1 uses they'll probably result in bad quality.

hmm. probability is just a guess, too.

formerly gabriel stated that the alt-presets shouldn't be affected by the changes (by design).

I don't see, why we shouldn't believe in that, until the contrary is proven.

EDIT: Sorry for quoting gabriel in here. as it turned out later in this thread, I was confusing him with another lame dev, namely Alexander Leidinger.

This post has been edited by amano: May 15 2003, 01:24
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd August 2014 - 15:10