IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Sampling/Time Resolution - In search of sources
FreaqyFrequency
post Oct 4 2011, 21:36
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 58
Joined: 4-October 11
From: VA Beach, VA
Member No.: 94145



Greetings all,

I've been lurking on these forums for about the last year, and I finally signed up today to pick the brains of some of the more knowledgeable individuals here.

On Saturday, I'm giving an 8 minute informative speech on the essential elements of digital audio (PCM to be exact, leaving DSD out given the time limit), why it was a logical progression from analog recording and storage technology, and a brief sketch of lossy/lossless implementations of it.

My primary objective at this point is to get a rock solid source, stating that (and why) any sampling rate is able to capture a given bandlimited source with perfect time resolution (ignoring frequency response and filtering in this case, dealing only with time). I was encouraged to touch upon this point in particular because of a presentation I found on YouTube a few months back, whose essential message was "Digital is bad because you hear the music as packets rather than as an analog waveform" and was advocating that everyone dispense with their digital media and go get a turntable and vinyls. My intent is to disprove the "packets" notion, and this source is the closest I have seen to doing that as of now:

http://www.tonmeister.ca/main/textbook/node639.html

If anyone could supply further documentation (or their own findings/conclusions on the matter), that would be most appreciated. Thanks! smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
MichaelW
post Feb 13 2012, 01:48
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 631
Joined: 15-March 07
Member No.: 41501



As the thread has been resurrected, and as the misconception it addresses is not likely to go away, it occurs to me (alas, mathematically illiterate) that a way to explain the basic point to the mathematically illiterate would be to start with the way that two points define a straight line and its extensions, three points a circle.

That should help to get over the difference between little bursts, as opposed to points defining a signal. You need to explain that first, you have to know the form of the line before you know how many points define it; but luckily, thanks to M. Fourier, we know we can work with sine waves.

Then on to frequency limits and the real stuff.

I hope I have got that right. My point in posting is that most people here know so much (but don't normally teach) that they find it hard to think their way back to just how basic you have to make things for beginners.

HTH
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- FreaqyFrequency   Sampling/Time Resolution - In search of sources   Oct 4 2011, 21:36
- - saratoga   QUOTE (FreaqyFrequency @ Oct 4 2011, 16:3...   Oct 4 2011, 21:40
- - benski   http://www.dspguide.com/ch3/3.htm Another good to...   Oct 4 2011, 21:41
- - FreaqyFrequency   Wow, you guys are quick on the draw! Thorough...   Oct 4 2011, 21:56
- - C.R.Helmrich   Was about to post the link that benski already pos...   Oct 4 2011, 22:19
- - xnor   Some introductory wiki pages: Sampling Nyquist-Sha...   Oct 4 2011, 22:42
- - Speedskater   You might look through member "woodinville...   Oct 4 2011, 23:21
- - knutinh   It is called Shannon-Nyquist sampling theoreme, an...   Oct 5 2011, 01:44
- - Axon   All I can suggest is to read this section from the...   Oct 5 2011, 02:23
- - FreaqyFrequency   Again, many thanks for all the replies, extremely ...   Oct 5 2011, 03:14
|- - dhromed   QUOTE (FreaqyFrequency @ Oct 5 2011, 04:1...   Oct 5 2011, 09:25
|- - db1989   I, too, like that analogy—and dhromed’s! Thi...   Oct 5 2011, 19:54
- - drewfx   The critical piece of information to stress to ...   Oct 5 2011, 17:38
|- - benski   QUOTE (drewfx @ Oct 5 2011, 12:38) The cr...   Oct 5 2011, 18:02
|- - dhromed   QUOTE (drewfx @ Oct 5 2011, 18:38) When t...   Oct 6 2011, 10:03
- - FreaqyFrequency   That is a great analogy, and analogies will be a s...   Oct 5 2011, 19:02
- - DVDdoug   QUOTE When the digital signal is converted back to...   Oct 6 2011, 00:03
- - krabapple   If you want to see the sorts of trainwrecks that h...   Oct 6 2011, 01:22
|- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (krabapple @ Oct 6 2011, 01:22) If ...   Oct 6 2011, 12:42
- - Woodinville   The time resolution of a PROPERLY reconstructed PC...   Oct 8 2011, 03:12
|- - Woodinville   QUOTE (Woodinville @ Oct 7 2011, 19:12) T...   Oct 9 2011, 00:04
|- - Northpack   QUOTE (Woodinville @ Oct 8 2011, 03:12) T...   Oct 9 2011, 11:28
|- - Woodinville   QUOTE (Northpack @ Oct 9 2011, 03:28) Tha...   Oct 9 2011, 11:45
- - FreaqyFrequency   Thank you very much JJ, I've been following yo...   Oct 8 2011, 17:33
- - FreaqyFrequency   So I was flipping through some of my documents as ...   Feb 12 2012, 23:47
- - MichaelW   As the thread has been resurrected, and as the mis...   Feb 13 2012, 01:48
- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (MichaelW @ Feb 13 2012, 00:48) two...   Feb 13 2012, 16:12
- - knutinh   QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Feb 13 2012, 17:12) On...   Feb 13 2012, 22:21
- - MichaelW   QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Feb 14 2012, 04:12) Pr...   Feb 13 2012, 23:02


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th September 2014 - 23:07