IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
"Band on the Run" unlimited remaster, "retains the dynamic range of the original master recording"
2Bdecided
post Nov 15 2010, 13:41
Post #51


ReplayGain developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 5176
Joined: 5-November 01
From: Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 409



QUOTE (C.R.Helmrich @ Nov 14 2010, 15:39) *
The waveforms and spectra of the two versions are then so similar that I didn't bother trying to ABX them.
As far as I can see, in the samples here...
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....c=84945&hl=
...there's 1 peak of a few (12?) samples that's been reduced by about 0.5dB (sample 966828), and everything else is virtually identical. Even concentrating on that peak, I can't hear the difference. I wouldn't expect to be able to!

If only more "limiting" was like this!

I assume in the loudest parts of the album there are more squashed the peaks, and so it might become audible.

btw, it's interesting just A/B-ing the tracks without level matching. The level difference is obvious, but I bet 90% of people would also claim the louder track is brighter - probably better over all, as well as louder. Whereas once they're level matched, they sound identical. I wonder how many people have done listening tests biassed in this way?

Cheers,
David.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Arnold B. Kruege...
post Nov 15 2010, 14:26
Post #52





Group: Members
Posts: 3945
Joined: 29-October 08
From: USA, 48236
Member No.: 61311



QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Nov 15 2010, 07:41) *
btw, it's interesting just A/B-ing the tracks without level matching. The level difference is obvious, but I bet 90% of people would also claim the louder track is brighter - probably better over all, as well as louder. Whereas once they're level matched, they sound identical. I wonder how many people have done listening tests biassed in this way?


This is one of the secrets to how to sell audio gear. Match levels by ear, which results in a random mismatch of about a dB or a few dB. Then present both alternatives along with a aales pitch about why one is obviously better.

Works just about every time!

People go into audio stores, whether brick-and-motar or web, with money to spend. To them, success is defined as actually making a decision and spending their money. All the sales people have to do is play along with them and help them complete their agenda. It seems almost cruel to confuse them with the relevant facts. ;-)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Josh358
post Nov 15 2010, 19:19
Post #53





Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 4-November 10
Member No.: 85212



QUOTE (greynol @ Nov 14 2010, 20:09) *
It's quite possible that the differences heard are do to less than ideal sample-rate conversion.


I think you're right. Though the argument can then be made that in an imperfect world, it's better to go with the format that's relatively immune to poor implementation, not just of standards converters but of DAC's and ADC's.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
greynol
post Nov 15 2010, 19:22
Post #54





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 10040
Joined: 1-April 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 13167



Certainly, which is why have foobar2000 configured with a resampler to convert 44.1kHz to 48kHz for playback with my soundcard.


--------------------
Your eyes cannot hear.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd October 2014 - 22:49