IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

"Band on the Run" unlimited remaster, "retains the dynamic range of the original master recording"
2Bdecided
post Nov 10 2010, 11:22
Post #1


ReplayGain developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 5180
Joined: 5-November 01
From: Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 409



The anti "loudness race" trend continues...

QUOTE
HIGH RESOLUTION DETAILS

The audio industry has seen many technical innovations since Band on the Run was first released on vinyl in 1973, the most notable being digital recording. However, with the introduction of CD came two advances, “de-noising” and “peak limiting” which have become increasingly unpopular within certain areas of the music industry and amongst audiophiles.

De-noising was introduced to remove the inherent sound, or hiss, associated with analogue tape. The amount of processing used to remove tape noise can be varied, but when used excessively, many believe that it also has a detrimental effect on elements of the musical sound.

Peak limiting is a process that increases the loudness of music. It is achieved by holding the loudest peaks down and raising the overall level of the music. Much depends on the amount of limiting applied, but at its most extreme the result can be a serious reduction in the dynamic range and often audible distortion.

The release of The Beatles’ remasters in 2009 saw a marked change in attitudes towards these issues, where both noise reduction and limiting were used sparingly with the aim of representing the master tapes more accurately. Such is the case with the newly remastered CD of Band on the Run: tape noise reduction has scarcely been used and the degree of limiting is subtle. In addition digital technology has advanced with the ability now to offer recordings in 24 bit/96kHz. The high resolution version is being made available via download and is being offered in two formats: limited, which is comparable in volume to the remastered CD, and un-limited, which in comparison with the limited version will sound quieter, but retain the dynamic range of the original master recording.


Allan Rouse Abbey Road Studios

They're "only" charging an extra 3 / $5 above the comparable "CD" download, though you have no option but to pay for the 9 extra bonus tracks if you want hi-res.

If you just want the normal album, you're paying double to get hi-res (limited or unlimited version).

9-track "CD" download: 6 / $9
18-track "CD" download: 10 / $15
Hi-Res download: 13 / $20
Both Hi-Res downloads: 23 / $36

From here:
http://www.paulmccartney.com/bandontherun/

Cheers,
David.

P.S. I haven't heard it. It's a shame it's not on Spotify! (The recent John Lennon releases are).

This post has been edited by 2Bdecided: Nov 10 2010, 12:15
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
BearcatSandor
post Nov 11 2010, 16:52
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 149
Joined: 18-May 10
From: Montana, USA
Member No.: 80732



There's something i don't get about this thread and something i don't get about the audiophile industry. It may be because i live out in the wood practically speaking and most of my neighbors are deer, but who are the "they" people are referring to? People who read Stereophle? I'm the only one i know that does. I live in a town of 2k people and i'd bet i'm the only one in town who knows what HDCD is.

How many people are you worried are gonna be suckered by this? We..uh..audioph...i mean music recreating hardware enthusiasts are very rare in my experiance.

Or perhaps i've just been hanging out with the coyotes too much.

This post has been edited by BearcatSandor: Nov 11 2010, 16:54


--------------------
Music lover and recovering high end audiophile
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Arnold B. Kruege...
post Nov 12 2010, 15:22
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 3968
Joined: 29-October 08
From: USA, 48236
Member No.: 61311



QUOTE (BearcatSandor @ Nov 11 2010, 10:52) *
There's something i don't get about this thread and something i don't get about the audiophile industry. It may be because i live out in the wood practically speaking and most of my neighbors are deer, but who are the "they" people are referring to? People who read Stereophle? I'm the only one i know that does. I live in a town of 2k people and i'd bet i'm the only one in town who knows what HDCD is.


Last time I saw an estimate, it was that the high end audiophile market in the US was composed of about 200,000 people. That is about 3/4 of one tenth of a percent of the population. That you are the only audiophile in a town of 2,000 seems about right. There might be one other in town that you don't know about.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BearcatSandor
post Nov 12 2010, 17:21
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 149
Joined: 18-May 10
From: Montana, USA
Member No.: 80732



QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Nov 12 2010, 07:22) *
QUOTE (BearcatSandor @ Nov 11 2010, 10:52) *
There's something i don't get about this thread and something i don't get about the audiophile industry. It may be because i live out in the wood practically speaking and most of my neighbors are deer, but who are the "they" people are referring to? People who read Stereophle? I'm the only one i know that does. I live in a town of 2k people and i'd bet i'm the only one in town who knows what HDCD is.


Last time I saw an estimate, it was that the high end audiophile market in the US was composed of about 200,000 people. That is about 3/4 of one tenth of a percent of the population. That you are the only audiophile in a town of 2,000 seems about right. There might be one other in town that you don't know about.

*dramatic music plays as he grabs his cape* and i will not rest until i find them!

well, the more people that come to listen to my reasonable hi-fi system, the more of them i create. Of course i now consider myself a mid-end audiophile, or a sensible one at least. That's interesting to know. Thanks Arnold.

Yeah, i can see how much little work it woud be to just throw it up on a web page. I was not thinking of it that way. In fact since it's most likely mastered/edited in 24-bit anyhow it's actually an extra step to turn it into 16/44.1 isn't it? So they save money that way. (well since 24-bit didn't exist when this album was made perhaps not, but at this point i'm just gonna go quiet and silently admit that i know just enough to be confused)

This post has been edited by BearcatSandor: Nov 12 2010, 17:23


--------------------
Music lover and recovering high end audiophile
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
greynol
post Nov 13 2010, 00:33
Post #5





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 10043
Joined: 1-April 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 13167



QUOTE (BearcatSandor @ Nov 12 2010, 08:21) *
In fact since it's most likely mastered/edited in 24-bit anyhow it's actually an extra step to turn it into 16/44.1 isn't it?

This step only needs to be done once and can be accomplished in a matter of minutes, literally. All processing is done at a higher resolution than 16-bits these days, and not just at professional studios.

This post has been edited by greynol: Nov 13 2010, 00:34


--------------------
Your eyes cannot hear.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- 2Bdecided   "Band on the Run" unlimited remaster   Nov 10 2010, 11:22
- - Notat   I don't see this as something to complain abou...   Nov 10 2010, 15:30
|- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (Notat @ Nov 10 2010, 14:30) I don...   Nov 11 2010, 11:19
- - AndyH-ha   It's hard to see how the selling prices are re...   Nov 10 2010, 22:19
|- - dhromed   QUOTE (AndyH-ha @ Nov 10 2010, 22:19...   Nov 10 2010, 22:29
|- - Soap   QUOTE (AndyH-ha @ Nov 10 2010, 16:19...   Nov 10 2010, 22:32
- - AndyH-ha   I don't question a sellers right to price his ...   Nov 10 2010, 22:39
- - Canar   While your point is very valid, Andy, Notat's ...   Nov 10 2010, 23:02
- - greynol   I understand the concept, but I don't think it...   Nov 10 2010, 23:08
|- - DVDdoug   QUOTE (greynol @ Nov 10 2010, 14:08) I do...   Nov 10 2010, 23:33
|- - Porcus   QUOTE (greynol @ Nov 10 2010, 23:08) I un...   Nov 15 2010, 05:03
|- - greynol   QUOTE (Porcus @ Nov 14 2010, 20:03) On th...   Nov 15 2010, 10:13
- - mixminus1   Also, if I'm reading the website correctly, on...   Nov 10 2010, 23:26
- - Teknojnky   I have to agree with greynol, this simply re-enfor...   Nov 10 2010, 23:26
- - Fandango   I'm wondering how this can actually turn the t...   Nov 10 2010, 23:56
|- - Josh358   QUOTE (Fandango @ Nov 10 2010, 17:56) I...   Nov 11 2010, 00:50
- - BearcatSandor   Also, the $30 price will further encourage pe...   Nov 11 2010, 02:27
- - JSW   I actually did pay $20 for the 24/96 "un...   Nov 11 2010, 02:35
|- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (JSW @ Nov 11 2010, 01:35) I actual...   Nov 11 2010, 11:33
- - Meeko   Wow...talk about choices. I'm not positive an...   Nov 11 2010, 14:46
- - zipr   What a confusing mess of a page that is! I won...   Nov 11 2010, 15:06
- - ramicio   I procured the unlimited version. Sounds nice. I...   Nov 11 2010, 16:33
- - BearcatSandor   There's something i don't get about this t...   Nov 11 2010, 16:52
|- - Josh358   QUOTE (BearcatSandor @ Nov 11 2010, 10:52...   Nov 11 2010, 23:30
|- - Arnold B. Krueger   QUOTE (BearcatSandor @ Nov 11 2010, 10:52...   Nov 12 2010, 15:22
|- - BearcatSandor   QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Nov 12 2010, 07...   Nov 12 2010, 17:21
|- - greynol   QUOTE (BearcatSandor @ Nov 12 2010, 08:21...   Nov 13 2010, 00:33
- - 2Bdecided   I agree. All of which makes it surprising that th...   Nov 12 2010, 11:04
|- - Josh358   QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Nov 12 2010, 05:04) I ...   Nov 12 2010, 19:48
- - Brand   I really like seeing major labels openly mention t...   Nov 12 2010, 13:19
- - ron spencer   I bought this...sounds nice. Price is good given ...   Nov 12 2010, 15:49
- - Wombat   I know this recording from back in the 70s and won...   Nov 12 2010, 16:15
|- - Josh358   QUOTE (Wombat @ Nov 12 2010, 10:15) I kno...   Nov 12 2010, 19:56
- - Wombat   QUOTE (Josh358 @ Nov 12 2010, 20:56) I su...   Nov 12 2010, 20:06
- - Batman321   I bought it, very nice sound. I converted these ...   Nov 12 2010, 20:25
- - jimmanningjr   I just got my hands on these 96/24 files of BOTR. ...   Nov 13 2010, 04:19
|- - Canar   QUOTE (jimmanningjr @ Nov 12 2010, 23:19)...   Nov 13 2010, 21:08
- - Brand   I got my hands on those as well (both limited and ...   Nov 13 2010, 21:06
- - jimmanningjr   Nice and Short Thanks   Nov 13 2010, 21:27
|- - Canar   QUOTE (jimmanningjr @ Nov 13 2010, 16:27)...   Nov 13 2010, 21:41
|- - jimmanningjr   You know I have had my doubts...that 16 bit was go...   Nov 13 2010, 23:04
|- - Josh358   QUOTE (jimmanningjr @ Nov 13 2010, 17:04)...   Nov 15 2010, 01:51
- - emte   I, unfortunately, must agree with the post above. ...   Nov 13 2010, 23:43
|- - jimmanningjr   Wondering if with the proper playback equipment if...   Nov 14 2010, 06:48
- - krabapple   You shouldn't expect an audible difference due...   Nov 14 2010, 08:52
- - greynol   I am not so sure that sensitivity/acuity to bit-de...   Nov 14 2010, 09:19
- - emte   I'm 22 and I have never noticed any audible di...   Nov 14 2010, 10:41
- - Brand   IMO there's no way there could be an audible d...   Nov 14 2010, 11:48
- - C.R.Helmrich   I'd probably take the limited version, because...   Nov 14 2010, 16:39
|- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (C.R.Helmrich @ Nov 14 2010, 15:39)...   Nov 15 2010, 13:41
|- - Arnold B. Krueger   QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Nov 15 2010, 07:41) bt...   Nov 15 2010, 14:26
- - greynol   It's quite possible that the differences heard...   Nov 15 2010, 02:09
|- - Josh358   QUOTE (greynol @ Nov 14 2010, 20:09) It...   Nov 15 2010, 19:19
- - greynol   Certainly, which is why have foobar2000 configured...   Nov 15 2010, 19:22


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th October 2014 - 11:31