IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Rarewares "Oggenc2.85using aoTuVb5.7" vs. venc.exe "aoT
mzso
post Oct 5 2010, 14:53
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 188
Joined: 2-May 07
Member No.: 43131



Did a conversion with both with the same settings but the results are different. Aren't they supposed to be the same since they oggenc uses aoTuVb5.7?

Edit: Didn't expect the title to be truncated without a notice. Originally the title was: "Rarewares "Oggenc2.85using aoTuVb5.7" vs. venc.exe "aoTuV Beta 5.7" different results"

This post has been edited by mzso: Oct 5 2010, 14:57
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 2)
Yirkha
post Oct 5 2010, 21:30
Post #2





Group: FB2K Moderator
Posts: 2359
Joined: 30-November 07
Member No.: 49158



How much different is different? When dealing with lossy codecs using complex math, even a different compiler or its settings can result in tiny changes in the output file.


--------------------
Full-quoting makes you scroll past the same junk over and over.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mzso
post Oct 5 2010, 22:18
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 188
Joined: 2-May 07
Member No.: 43131



QUOTE (Yirkha @ Oct 5 2010, 21:30) *
How much different is different? When dealing with lossy codecs using complex math, even a different compiler or its settings can result in tiny changes in the output file.

I don't know. I just used foobars's bitcompare tool, which told me that the differences start at 0.4687755 s. I also looked at them with TC's bitcompare tool but that didn't help much since the length is a little bit different, I'm guessing different metadata. But the data seems to start and end the same bits by looking at them.
What better tool could I compare them?

This post has been edited by mzso: Oct 5 2010, 22:54
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th December 2014 - 00:50