Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Can -q2 really be "almost" transparent?
post Mar 18 2010, 15:57
Post #1

Group: Members
Posts: 58
Joined: 2-November 04
Member No.: 17953

I'm sitting here listening to some -q2 encoded Vorbis (using aoTuv Beta 5.7; nominal bitrate 96 kbps) and, after thinking for years and years that nothing below 128 kbps could possibly sound decent on any codec (based on listening to MP3, WMA and AAC) I amazingly find that I can't reliably ABX it from the original FLACs. I can ABX some samples, but the artifacts are really, really minute things that I would never pick up in more casual listening and there are plenty of samples that I can't ABX at -q2 that I can ABX at substantially higher bitrates with other codecs. Therefore, I call -q2 "almost" transparent.

Have others had this experience or does my hearing or equipment just suck? Also, has anyone ever seen any other codec besides aoTuv that gets even remotely close to transparency in the ~96 kbps area? I'm not aware of any, which is why I'm so shocked by these results.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th March 2015 - 23:09