IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

What Ogg Vorbis encoder would you like to see in a listening test?, oggdropXPd 1.9.0 vs. oggenc2.85 (Either libVorbis v1.2.3 aoTuVb5.7)
ezlez
post Feb 23 2010, 08:02
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 24-October 09
From: California, US
Member No.: 74271



I'm going to conduct a multi-format listening test very soon, and I need only one encoder per format. I'm deciding between oggdropXPd 1.9.0 vs. oggenc2.85 (Either libVorbis v1.2.3 aoTuVb5.7), and I wanted on what your thoughts are, since I don't have much experience with Ogg Vorbis. All the encoders are coming from Rarewares.org.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
timcupery
post Feb 23 2010, 22:04
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 780
Joined: 19-December 01
From: Tar Heel country
Member No.: 683



as lvqcl said, oggdropXPd vs. oggenc doesn't matter, that's simply an issue of frontend.
what does matter is which encoder. and it sounds like aoTuV b5.7 is the newer encoder (and more recently optimized, and thus likely but not guaranteed to be better)


--------------------
God kills a kitten every time you encode with CBR 320
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st August 2014 - 07:33