IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Interesting Papers re temporal resolution
ncdrawl
post Jul 25 2009, 07:27
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 5-October 08
Member No.: 59436



http://www.physics.sc.edu/kunchur/Acoustics-papers.htm

http://www.physics.sc.edu/kunchur/papers/FAQs.pdf
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
ultrasonic
post Jan 2 2010, 05:09
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 2-January 10
Member No.: 76595



QUOTE (rpp3po @ Aug 3 2009, 02:42) *
QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Aug 3 2009, 02:24) *
Nobody seems to be able to do it. Instead, all we get are these abstract tests like Kunchur's, involving some most definately non-musical waveforms with questionable relevance and inconclusive results.


I agree. Not a single positive result in a decade is simple but mortgageable evidence.


Does this count?:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showpost.ph...mp;postcount=28
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Arnold B. Kruege...
post Jan 2 2010, 06:01
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 3963
Joined: 29-October 08
From: USA, 48236
Member No.: 61311



QUOTE (ultrasonic @ Jan 1 2010, 23:09) *
QUOTE (rpp3po @ Aug 3 2009, 02:42) *
QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Aug 3 2009, 02:24) *
Nobody seems to be able to do it. Instead, all we get are these abstract tests like Kunchur's, involving some most definately non-musical waveforms with questionable relevance and inconclusive results.


I agree. Not a single positive result in a decade is simple but mortgageable evidence.


Does this count?:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showpost.ph...mp;postcount=28


In the opinon of many, no.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ultrasonic
post Jan 2 2010, 06:37
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 2-January 10
Member No.: 76595



QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Jan 2 2010, 07:01) *
QUOTE (ultrasonic @ Jan 1 2010, 23:09) *
QUOTE (rpp3po @ Aug 3 2009, 02:42) *
QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Aug 3 2009, 02:24) *
Nobody seems to be able to do it. Instead, all we get are these abstract tests like Kunchur's, involving some most definately non-musical waveforms with questionable relevance and inconclusive results.


I agree. Not a single positive result in a decade is simple but mortgageable evidence.


Does this count?:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showpost.ph...mp;postcount=28


In the opinon of many, no.


Opinion isn't good enough. The paper is scientific and peer-reviewed. It may be flawed, but if so it needs to be debunked scientifically. Can you provide links to similarly peer-reviewed refutations of the paper?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Woodinville
post Jan 2 2010, 10:29
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 1402
Joined: 9-January 05
From: JJ's office.
Member No.: 18957



QUOTE (ultrasonic @ Jan 1 2010, 21:37) *
Opinion isn't good enough. The paper is scientific and peer-reviewed.

So, if a paper comes out that claims, oh, say, that ESP works, and is published in an ESP journal, "opinion is not enough" even though there has never, ever, to date, been an unbiased test of ESP that shows it works. (Hint: Such papers exist.)

So, if a paper comes out in the journal of the ICR, showing that we were all created 6000 years ago, and the Grand Canyon was made during the "great flood", "opinion is not enough" even though in reputable journals there are thousands of pages on the erosion history of the Grand Canyon during the rise of the Colorado Plateau. (Hint: Such papers exist.)

So, if a paper comes out and gets published in a very odd journal that says "rocks fall up", "opinion is not enough" even if the rock always falls on your toe? (I'm not aware of any such papers, thankfully, although some TM practitioners claim you can levitate by meditation, I don't think even TM journals have published it as a "paper".)
QUOTE
It may be flawed, but if so it needs to be debunked scientifically. Can you provide links to similarly peer-reviewed refutations of the paper?


I think it's time for a reality check. "peer-reviewed refutations" is not what you will see in a journal. You're asking for something that is never going to exist, it's not how the system works.

What you will see is work showing something that reads on the subject, positive, negative, whatever.

And there is an entire forest of paper on that, dating from the 1920's to present.

Before any weight is put on the paper, it has to be REPEATED AND CONFIRMED. That is the scientific process. Going on about "peer reviewed" misses the mark in so many ways I hardly know where to start. The paper provides a presumed means to allow confirmation or perhaps not confirmation. As such, even if the reviewer has doubts, it may be published simply to start a dialog. Controversial papers are published, I ought to know, I published a couple of early papers on audio coding in light of reviewers who basically accused me of lying through my teeth. Yet, the papers were published, others also published, and now most everyone on the planet uses some form of the technology.

If you want to support this premise, repeat the experiment and see if you can confirm the results. You might even try to improve the experimental process, and try several different kinds of ultrasonic stimulii to see what's going on.

Finally, as a comment on ultrasonic stimulii, please check http://www.csgnetwork.com/atmossndabsorbcalc.html for the performance of the atmosphere under conditions of no wind, static atmosphere, etc.

Then consider the effects of wind and turbulence.


--------------------
-----
J. D. (jj) Johnston
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- ncdrawl   Interesting Papers re temporal resolution   Jul 25 2009, 07:27
- - rpp3po   I'm not sure wether they have actually tested ...   Jul 25 2009, 13:17
- - Ethan Winer   Nice to see this topic here where it can be discus...   Jul 25 2009, 18:26
- - hellokeith   from the link: QUOTE Our recent behavioral studies...   Jul 25 2009, 20:39
|- - C.R.Helmrich   QUOTE (hellokeith @ Jul 25 2009, 21:39) D...   Jul 25 2009, 22:09
||- - rpp3po   QUOTE (C.R.Helmrich @ Jul 25 2009, 23:09)...   Jul 25 2009, 22:28
||- - Woodinville   QUOTE (rpp3po @ Jul 25 2009, 14:28) Well,...   Jul 28 2009, 09:27
|- - John_Siau   From the first paragraph at: www.physics.sc.edu/ku...   Jul 31 2009, 19:16
|- - andy_c   QUOTE (John_Siau @ Jul 31 2009, 12:16) Th...   Jul 31 2009, 21:30
- - hellokeith   Well after reading through the first 3 PDF's a...   Jul 26 2009, 01:24
- - Axon   Don't even bother using a square wave generato...   Jul 28 2009, 02:55
|- - rpp3po   Yes, I asked myself why Adobe would even include s...   Jul 28 2009, 03:06
- - Mike Giacomelli   I only skimmed the paper, but IIRC tried a digital...   Jul 28 2009, 03:31
- - Canar   Now the WAV files won't load in foobar2000... ...   Jul 28 2009, 03:51
|- - rpp3po   QUOTE (Canar @ Jul 28 2009, 04:51) These ...   Jul 28 2009, 11:37
|- - lvqcl   QUOTE (rpp3po @ Jul 28 2009, 14:37) Could...   Jul 28 2009, 12:52
|- - Mike Giacomelli   QUOTE (rpp3po @ Jul 28 2009, 06:37) Could...   Jul 28 2009, 15:58
- - Nick.C   Why not just just create a 7.35kHz square wave ...   Jul 28 2009, 13:13
|- - benski   QUOTE (Nick.C @ Jul 28 2009, 08:13) Why n...   Jul 31 2009, 15:39
|- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (benski @ Jul 31 2009, 15:39) QUOTE...   Jul 31 2009, 16:33
|- - benski   QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Jul 31 2009, 11:33) QU...   Jul 31 2009, 16:39
- - Axon   Because that places unacceptable restrictions on t...   Jul 28 2009, 16:12
- - Canar   If I may grossly oversimplify your argument Axon, ...   Jul 28 2009, 19:46
|- - Axon   QUOTE (Canar @ Jul 28 2009, 13:46) If I m...   Jul 28 2009, 20:14
||- - andy_c   I'd like to add a few comments regarding the ...   Jul 29 2009, 16:52
||- - Axon   QUOTE (andy_c @ Jul 29 2009, 10:52) I...   Jul 29 2009, 17:11
||- - andy_c   QUOTE (Axon @ Jul 29 2009, 10:11) Well, g...   Jul 29 2009, 17:27
|- - Mike Giacomelli   QUOTE (Canar @ Jul 28 2009, 14:46) As an ...   Jul 28 2009, 21:08
|- - NullC   QUOTE (Mike Giacomelli @ Jul 28 2009, 12...   Jul 29 2009, 05:48
|- - Mike Giacomelli   QUOTE (NullC @ Jul 29 2009, 00:48) QUOTE ...   Jul 29 2009, 16:19
- - Axon   So, on that note.... an off topic comment. I just ...   Jul 29 2009, 17:01
|- - Canar   QUOTE (Axon @ Jul 29 2009, 09:01) So, on ...   Jul 29 2009, 18:18
- - krabapple   It may well be that Dr. Kunchur's audio work i...   Jul 29 2009, 17:04
- - kode54   Where did you come up with that 1.45GHz figure? Th...   Jul 29 2009, 20:22
- - Axon   Well, I'm thinking more specifically of the th...   Jul 29 2009, 20:41
- - Audible!   QUOTE (ncdrawl @ Jul 30 2009, 23:07) QUOT...   Jul 31 2009, 08:36
- - 2Bdecided   Yes, I see it now (having tried it!), it's...   Jul 31 2009, 17:13
- - John_Siau   From the summary paragraph in "Audibility of ...   Jul 31 2009, 19:37
|- - Axon   QUOTE (John_Siau @ Jul 31 2009, 13:37) Fr...   Jul 31 2009, 21:28
|- - John_Siau   QUOTE (Axon @ Jul 31 2009, 16:28) That se...   Jul 31 2009, 22:15
|- - WernerO   QUOTE (Axon @ Jul 31 2009, 21:28) Dr. Kun...   Aug 1 2009, 06:46
|- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (Axon @ Jul 31 2009, 21:28) That se...   Aug 1 2009, 08:24
|- - rpp3po   I'm just coming back from vacation. Thanks for...   Aug 2 2009, 17:42
|- - Arnold B. Krueger   QUOTE (rpp3po @ Aug 2 2009, 12:42) But un...   Aug 3 2009, 01:24
|- - rpp3po   QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Aug 3 2009, 02...   Aug 3 2009, 01:42
|- - ncdrawl   QUOTE (rpp3po @ Aug 2 2009, 20:42) QUOTE ...   Aug 3 2009, 04:59
|- - krabapple   QUOTE (ncdrawl @ Aug 2 2009, 23:59) QUOTE...   Aug 3 2009, 07:57
|- - WernerO   QUOTE (ncdrawl @ Aug 3 2009, 04:59) Dr. K...   Aug 3 2009, 08:52
||- - Axon   QUOTE (WernerO @ Aug 3 2009, 02:52) QUOTE...   Aug 3 2009, 19:02
|||- - honestguv   QUOTE (Axon @ Aug 3 2009, 20:02) BTW, I f...   Aug 3 2009, 19:35
||- - ncdrawl   QUOTE (WernerO @ Aug 3 2009, 03:52) we do...   Aug 8 2009, 00:03
|- - honestguv   > Dr. Kunchur will be posting confutations in f...   Aug 3 2009, 08:54
|- - andy_c   Regarding my earlier post about the lack of second...   Aug 3 2009, 17:34
- - benski   I need to do further reading to do a full refutati...   Aug 3 2009, 20:10
|- - benski   Also, for his FAQ example of two peaks separated b...   Aug 3 2009, 20:24
|- - WernerO   QUOTE (benski @ Aug 3 2009, 21:24) two pe...   Aug 3 2009, 20:56
||- - Axon   QUOTE (WernerO @ Aug 3 2009, 14:56) QUOTE...   Aug 3 2009, 21:04
||- - benski   QUOTE (WernerO @ Aug 3 2009, 15:56) QUOTE...   Aug 3 2009, 21:22
|||- - WernerO   QUOTE (benski @ Aug 3 2009, 22:22) Please...   Aug 4 2009, 08:11
|||- - benski   QUOTE (WernerO @ Aug 4 2009, 03:11) QUOTE...   Aug 4 2009, 14:34
||- - honestguv   QUOTE (WernerO @ Aug 3 2009, 21:56) But t...   Aug 3 2009, 21:47
||- - benski   QUOTE (honestguv @ Aug 3 2009, 16:47) QUO...   Aug 3 2009, 22:04
||- - honestguv   QUOTE (benski @ Aug 3 2009, 23:04) They a...   Aug 3 2009, 22:49
|- - 2Bdecided   QUOTE (benski @ Aug 3 2009, 20:24) Also, ...   Aug 3 2009, 22:05
- - Canar   I just had a random thought about this and I wante...   Aug 4 2009, 02:41
|- - andy_c   Well, the 4.7us time constant does decrease the le...   Aug 4 2009, 02:57
|- - andy_c   Here's another thing I noticed in his test app...   Aug 4 2009, 14:23
||- - Arnold B. Krueger   QUOTE (andy_c @ Aug 4 2009, 09:23) Here...   Aug 13 2009, 12:56
|- - Pio2001   Hello, I've just read the first and third arti...   Apr 18 2010, 23:07
|- - C.R.Helmrich   QUOTE (Pio2001 @ Apr 19 2010, 00:07) Ther...   Apr 18 2010, 23:56
|- - Arnold B. Krueger   QUOTE (Pio2001 @ Apr 18 2010, 18:07) QUOT...   Apr 19 2010, 14:49
- - ultrasonic   QUOTE (rpp3po @ Aug 3 2009, 02:42) QUOTE ...   Jan 2 2010, 05:09
|- - Woodinville   QUOTE (ultrasonic @ Jan 1 2010, 20:09) QU...   Jan 2 2010, 05:28
||- - ultrasonic   QUOTE (Woodinville @ Jan 2 2010, 06:28) Q...   Jan 2 2010, 05:41
||- - Arnold B. Krueger   QUOTE (ultrasonic @ Jan 1 2010, 23:41) QU...   Jan 2 2010, 06:15
|- - Arnold B. Krueger   QUOTE (ultrasonic @ Jan 1 2010, 23:09) QU...   Jan 2 2010, 06:01
|- - ultrasonic   QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Jan 2 2010, 07...   Jan 2 2010, 06:37
|- - Arnold B. Krueger   QUOTE (ultrasonic @ Jan 2 2010, 00:37) QU...   Jan 2 2010, 06:52
|- - Woodinville   QUOTE (ultrasonic @ Jan 1 2010, 21:37) Op...   Jan 2 2010, 10:29
||- - Arnold B. Krueger   QUOTE (Woodinville @ Jan 2 2010, 04:29) B...   Jan 2 2010, 13:24
|- - krabapple   QUOTE (ultrasonic @ Jan 2 2010, 00:37) Op...   Jan 3 2010, 06:43
- - Woodinville   It is interesting to note that now the same people...   Jun 15 2010, 19:31
- - Arnold B. Krueger   QUOTE (Woodinville @ Jun 15 2010, 14:31) ...   Jun 16 2010, 11:09
- - Paulhoff   QUOTE (Woodinville @ Jun 15 2010, 14:31) ...   Jun 16 2010, 12:33
2 Pages V   1 2 >


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th October 2014 - 13:22