IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Post your DAE Quality results, Attempt to collect DAE Quality results
Jan S.
post Dec 29 2007, 21:10
Post #1





Group: Admin
Posts: 2550
Joined: 26-September 01
From: Denmark
Member No.: 21



Reading the forums I've seen people refer to their own private results with DAE quality tool but I haven't seen a single place where someone actually published their results in detail (C2 graphs etc.).
So I'd like to know if there actually have been published results for various drives somewhere.
If not I encourage people that have results lying around to publish them.
I myself have plans to get my hands on some old plextor drives and test those and of course also test the other drives from various manufacturers I have.


Edit:
Numerous tests have now been published. Be aware that you can't directly compare tests made by different people since different test cds were used.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
ell-ess-dee
post Mar 5 2008, 17:31
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 3-September 06
Member No.: 34768



PLEXTOR 40TS - 4 days old from out of box - test at 12X



CODE
Errors total        Num : 1080777
Errors (Loudness)   Num :  32449 - Avg :  -70.4 dB(A)   -  Max :   -8.3 dB(A)
Error Muting        Num :  10156 - Avg :   15.8 Samples -  Max :   3583 Samples
Skips               Num :     49 - Avg :   24.7 Samples -  Max :    406 Samples

Total Test Result       :   59.2 points (of 100.0 maximum)



SAMSUNG SH-203P - test at 12X



CODE
Errors total        Num : 689410
Errors (Loudness)   Num :  21612 - Avg :  -69.8 dB(A)   -  Max :  -17.8 dB(A)
Error Muting        Num :   2880 - Avg :    1.1 Samples -  Max :      3 Samples
Skips               Num :      0 - Avg :    0.0 Samples -  Max :      0 Samples

Total Test Result       :   77.7 points (of 100.0 maximum)


Why are these Plextors regarded as one of the best drives?????

This post has been edited by ell-ess-dee: Mar 5 2008, 17:40
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ell-ess-dee
post Mar 5 2008, 22:04
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 3-September 06
Member No.: 34768



Interesting..

PLEXTOR 40TS @ 4X



CODE
Errors total        Num : 302066
Errors (Loudness)   Num :  20179 - Avg :  -77.8 dB(A)   -  Max :  -12.0 dB(A)
Error Muting        Num :    436 - Avg :    4.6 Samples -  Max :    445 Samples
Skips               Num :      0 - Avg :    0.0 Samples -  Max :      0 Samples

Total Test Result       :   78.1 points (of 100.0 maximum)


SAMSUNG SH-203P @ 8X (will not go down any lower)



CODE
Errors total        Num : 3746558
Errors (Loudness)   Num :  43730 - Avg :  -55.3 dB(A)   -  Max :   -8.7 dB(A)
Error Muting        Num :   6570 - Avg :   26.8 Samples -  Max :   3584 Samples
Skips               Num :      0 - Avg :    0.0 Samples -  Max :      0 Samples

Total Test Result       :   73.2 points (of 100.0 maximum)


So the Plextor gets better and the Sammy gets worse unsure.gif

This post has been edited by ell-ess-dee: Mar 5 2008, 22:05
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
greynol
post Mar 5 2008, 22:11
Post #4





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 10000
Joined: 1-April 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 13167



QUOTE (ell-ess-dee @ Mar 5 2008, 13:04) *
So the Plextor gets better and the Sammy gets worse unsure.gif
This is not unusual. Plextor drives are known to do better at lower speeds, but this isn't true for all drives.

I know that DAE Quality can't report on the C2 accuracy of some drives, but it would still be nice to see results when it can.


--------------------
I should publish a list of forum idiots.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th September 2014 - 04:33