IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
LAME 3.97b2, New beta release
xmixahlx
post Nov 28 2005, 22:41
Post #26





Group: Members
Posts: 1394
Joined: 20-December 01
From: seattle
Member No.: 693



QUOTE (5paz @ Nov 27 2005, 05:14 PM)
Hi,
Is there a apt-key signature key for your debian RareWare repositories. I'm using sid and I can just use --allow-unauthenticated with apt-get but I like to use aptitude and it just looks ugly blink.gif  with all those U's splattered all over the place.
thanks
*

no. i don't develop/package with a key yet (so, none is available for the repo). It isn't a high priority, either.

(...oh, i'll get to 3.97b2 when i get home from work, btw)


later

This post has been edited by xmixahlx: Nov 28 2005, 22:42


--------------------
RareWares/Debian :: http://www.rarewares.org/debian.html
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Madrigal
post Nov 29 2005, 15:34
Post #27





Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: 8-December 01
From: Indiana, U.S.A.
Member No.: 608



QUOTE (john33 @ Nov 28 2005, 05:12 AM)
I will post a 'final' beta, plus derivative compiles, once the beta 2 version is announced at Sourceforge. Only then can we be sure that we have the full beta 2 release. wink.gif
*
It's unclear to me, has this been done now ?

EDIT: I'm not quite sure how to go about checking for announcement of the beta 2 version at Sourceforge, is there a link ?

Regards,
Madrigal

This post has been edited by Madrigal: Nov 29 2005, 15:38
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john33
post Nov 29 2005, 15:49
Post #28


xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 3760
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Bracknell, UK
Member No.: 111



QUOTE (Madrigal @ Nov 29 2005, 02:34 PM)
QUOTE (john33 @ Nov 28 2005, 05:12 AM)
I will post a 'final' beta, plus derivative compiles, once the beta 2 version is announced at Sourceforge. Only then can we be sure that we have the full beta 2 release. wink.gif
*
It's unclear to me, has this been done now ?

EDIT: I'm not quite sure how to go about checking for announcement of the beta 2 version at Sourceforge, is there a link ?

Regards,
Madrigal
*


All the beta 2 compiles now at Rarewares are the final beta 2 versions. smile.gif


--------------------
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Madrigal
post Nov 29 2005, 15:54
Post #29





Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: 8-December 01
From: Indiana, U.S.A.
Member No.: 608



QUOTE (john33 @ Nov 29 2005, 09:49 AM)
All the beta 2 compiles now at Rarewares are the final beta 2 versions. smile.gif
Thank you. biggrin.gif

Regards,
Madrigal
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Synthetic Soul
post Nov 29 2005, 16:10
Post #30





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 4887
Joined: 12-August 04
From: Exeter, UK
Member No.: 16217



Thanks John.

NB: lamedropXPd says it is using beta 1. Edit: On Encoding Options dialogue.

I like the spinning LAME logo. smile.gif

This post has been edited by Synthetic Soul: Nov 29 2005, 16:12


--------------------
I'm on a horse.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john33
post Nov 29 2005, 17:10
Post #31


xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 3760
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Bracknell, UK
Member No.: 111



QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Nov 29 2005, 03:10 PM)
Thanks John.

NB: lamedropXPd says it is using beta 1.  Edit: On Encoding Options dialogue.

Oh b*gg*r!! OK, I've fixed that and uploaded again. It was only the narrative, it was using the correct libs. BTW, thanks for letting me know. wink.gif
QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Nov 29 2005, 03:10 PM)
I like the spinning LAME logo. smile.gif
*

cool.gif


--------------------
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DARcode
post Nov 29 2005, 18:45
Post #32





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 682
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Italy
Member No.: 18968



Thanks a bunch, john33! Appreciated.


--------------------
WavPack 4.70.0 -b384hx6cmv/qaac 2.43 -V 100
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jamesbaud
post Nov 29 2005, 23:01
Post #33





Group: Members
Posts: 107
Joined: 15-December 03
Member No.: 10468



QUOTE (DARcode @ Nov 29 2005, 09:45 AM)
Thanks a bunch, john33! Appreciated.
*


Same here! Thx to the LAME devs also! laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
indybrett
post Nov 30 2005, 01:21
Post #34





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 1350
Joined: 4-March 02
From: Indianapolis, IN
Member No.: 1440



...and I just finished encoding 11,000+ songs with B1, lol. Glad I have them all FLAC'd.


--------------------
flac>fb2k>kernel streaming>audiophile 2496>magni>dt990 pro
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChiGung
post Nov 30 2005, 02:40
Post #35





Group: Members
Posts: 439
Joined: 9-February 05
From: county down
Member No.: 19713



note: Theres only a point in re-encoding if they're at preset fast medium or insane. Not an urgent need to do so even if so.

This post has been edited by ChiGung: Nov 30 2005, 06:55


--------------------
no conscience > no custom
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
indybrett
post Nov 30 2005, 02:42
Post #36





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 1350
Joined: 4-March 02
From: Indianapolis, IN
Member No.: 1440



-V 2 --vbr-new -Y

That's what I use, so I probably won't re-encode for awhile ;-)


--------------------
flac>fb2k>kernel streaming>audiophile 2496>magni>dt990 pro
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jaybeee
post Nov 30 2005, 15:20
Post #37





Group: Members
Posts: 410
Joined: 20-October 04
From: UK
Member No.: 17750



QUOTE (ChiGung @ Nov 30 2005, 01:40 AM)
insane.
*

te he - now that's a sneaky little link in the 'i' isn't it


--------------------
http://www.health4ni.com/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Analog
post Nov 30 2005, 16:58
Post #38





Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 7-October 05
Member No.: 24956



lamedropXPd writes comment field: Encoded using LAME-3.97b1 in tag.

This post has been edited by Analog: Nov 30 2005, 17:03
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Vivadavid
post Nov 30 2005, 17:13
Post #39





Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 19-October 05
Member No.: 25221



QUOTE (indybrett @ Nov 29 2005, 07:42 PM)
-V 2 --vbr-new -Y

That's what I use, so I probably won't re-encode for awhile ;-)
*


Sorry, but what is -Y for?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
indybrett
post Nov 30 2005, 17:17
Post #40





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 1350
Joined: 4-March 02
From: Indianapolis, IN
Member No.: 1440



QUOTE (Vivadavid @ Nov 30 2005, 11:13 AM)
QUOTE (indybrett @ Nov 29 2005, 07:42 PM)
-V 2 --vbr-new -Y

That's what I use, so I probably won't re-encode for awhile ;-)
*


Sorry, but what is -Y for?
*



Disables SFB21, so nothing above 16khz is encoded. Personal preference, because I can't hear that high anyway, and it reduces filesize.

Edit: yes, i know about preset medium wink.gif

This post has been edited by indybrett: Nov 30 2005, 17:18


--------------------
flac>fb2k>kernel streaming>audiophile 2496>magni>dt990 pro
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChiGung
post Nov 30 2005, 17:43
Post #41





Group: Members
Posts: 439
Joined: 9-February 05
From: county down
Member No.: 19713



QUOTE (jaybeee @ Nov 30 2005, 02:20 PM)
te he - now that's a sneaky little link in the 'i' isn't it

blink.gif -must be a bug in the forum software hawkeye... wink.gif


--------------------
no conscience > no custom
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john33
post Nov 30 2005, 18:25
Post #42


xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 3760
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Bracknell, UK
Member No.: 111



QUOTE (Analog @ Nov 30 2005, 03:58 PM)
lamedropXPd writes comment field: Encoded using LAME-3.97b1 in tag.
*

And, again - b*gg*r!! I think I'll simply remove that tag - it's not exactly necessary. Thanks for the notification. wink.gif I'll upload again a little later.


--------------------
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BinaryTB
post Dec 3 2005, 09:14
Post #43





Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 7-July 05
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 23188



QUOTE
lame.exe fixed for .mp2 and mp3 decoding: lame.exe only (ICL4.5). For mp3 and mp2 decoding, this now yields the same output as foobar2000 but the error checking remains unchanged.
2005-11-29

That's for 3.97b2. 3.97b1 had a fixed exe as well from what I remember and 3.96.1.

Why have a fixed exe for decoding separately for each version? Can't the fixes be included in the regular versions?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john33
post Dec 3 2005, 11:05
Post #44


xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 3760
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Bracknell, UK
Member No.: 111



QUOTE (Spooon69 @ Dec 3 2005, 08:14 AM)
QUOTE
lame.exe fixed for .mp2 and mp3 decoding: lame.exe only (ICL4.5). For mp3 and mp2 decoding, this now yields the same output as foobar2000 but the error checking remains unchanged.
2005-11-29

That's for 3.97b2. 3.97b1 had a fixed exe as well from what I remember and 3.96.1.

Why have a fixed exe for decoding separately for each version? Can't the fixes be included in the regular versions?
*


The necessary changes have now been merged into the latest 3.98alpha so there will be no more 'fixed' versions after the 3.97 ones. wink.gif


--------------------
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alex B
post Dec 5 2005, 15:56
Post #45





Group: Members
Posts: 1303
Joined: 14-September 05
From: Helsinki, Finland
Member No.: 24472



QUOTE (Synaptic Line Noise @ Nov 28 2005, 07:14 PM)
          o ReplayGain analysis should now be faster when encountering silent parts

Maybe related, but awhile ago I created a silent sound file in soundforge and encoded it with: mppenc, LAME, and Nero AAC.
I noticed that LAME took approximately 7x longer to encode pure silence than the others. I thought it was a little strange.
*

This has obviously changed. Analyzing silent parts is much faster now. I tested the behavior in this thread: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=39198.


--------------------
http://listening-tests.freetzi.com
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alex B
post Dec 5 2005, 16:08
Post #46





Group: Members
Posts: 1303
Joined: 14-September 05
From: Helsinki, Finland
Member No.: 24472



I just noticed this.

"Your file doesn't exist, or you didn't select one."

The Win32 and LameDrop XPd download links at the recommended LAME compiles Wiki page are broken:

List of recommended LAME compiles

http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Lame_Compiles


--------------------
http://listening-tests.freetzi.com
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
huh-hah
post Dec 7 2005, 11:27
Post #47





Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 29-November 05
Member No.: 26089



3.98a2 (up at Rarewares); is it safe?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
larswes
post Dec 7 2005, 12:08
Post #48





Group: Members
Posts: 54
Joined: 25-September 04
From: Sweden
Member No.: 17288



QUOTE (huh-hah @ Dec 7 2005, 12:27 PM)
3.98a2 (up at Rarewares); is it safe?
*

From This sticky thread:
Lame alphas are ONLY for testing. Do NOT use Lame alphas unless you want to test it and maybe provide feedback.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
huh-hah
post Dec 7 2005, 12:53
Post #49





Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 29-November 05
Member No.: 26089



QUOTE (larswes @ Dec 7 2005, 12:08 PM)
From This sticky thread:
Lame alphas are ONLY for testing. Do NOT use Lame alphas unless you want to test it and maybe provide feedback.
*



thanks. yes, i know it says that. i'm still curious if anyone has had any problems running it.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stephanV
post Dec 7 2005, 12:56
Post #50





Group: Members
Posts: 394
Joined: 6-May 04
Member No.: 13932



Maybe you can tell us your experiences in the meanwhile? smile.gif

This post has been edited by stephanV: Dec 7 2005, 12:56


--------------------
"We cannot win against obsession. They care, we don't. They win."
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th October 2014 - 19:22