IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Lame 3.96.1 compiles
Donunus
post Jul 10 2005, 17:26
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 226
Joined: 8-July 05
Member No.: 23210



are there any differences with lame 3.96.1 from rarewares and mitiok. Does anyone know why the exe sizes are different? I can't seem to find anything on the topic.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Digga
post Jul 10 2005, 17:56
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 1047
Joined: 28-June 03
From: on the dock of the bay
Member No.: 7423



QUOTE (Donunus @ Jul 10 2005, 05:26 PM)
are there any differences with lame 3.96.1 from rarewares and mitiok. Does anyone know why the exe sizes are different? I can't seem to find anything on the topic.
probably different compilers / flags.


--------------------
Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fj4
post Jul 10 2005, 17:57
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 10-July 05
Member No.: 23253



I too am interested as to the differences. Donunus, please try encoding the same .wav (from commandline) and post about any difference. I downloaded the Mitiok compile 3.96.1 a while back and the commandline says it's 3.96 (I notice this after encoding 100's of CDs...) crying.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Donunus
post Jul 10 2005, 18:20
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 226
Joined: 8-July 05
Member No.: 23210



QUOTE (fj4 @ Jul 11 2005, 12:57 AM)
I too am interested as to the differences.  Donunus, please try encoding the same .wav (from commandline) and post about any difference.  I downloaded the Mitiok compile 3.96.1 a while back and the commandline says it's 3.96 (I notice this after encoding 100's of CDs...)  crying.gif
*


That happened to me before but i downloaded another copy and its 3.96.1 is now in the command line. This is still from mitiok. havent tried the rarewares one. just downloaded it now for backup.

I want a few comments first before I experiment but so far the only problem of the 3.96.1 I'm currently ripping with at preset extreme is that sometimes there are time errors with the mp3s(1 out of a thousand or so). I rip the same songs again and it fixes the problem. sounds better IMO than the recommended 3.90.3 Lame. I trusted my impulses after listening to just a few songs that it didn't sound as dry and seemed to have better PrAt than the older lame.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tropican
post Jul 10 2005, 18:57
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 22-May 05
Member No.: 22203



This has been brought up many times. I'm not sure if this thread is still valid:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....topic=20759&hl=

Here are my own tests and some info:


Must be different flags, same compiler in readme from package:

QUOTE
Compiled with icl 4.5 & nasm.exe & dll were compressed with UPX executable packer http://upx.sourceforge.net/

mitiok


The results from the two compiles are bit-identical:

CODE
INFO (foo_bitcompare) : Comparing:
INFO (foo_bitcompare) : location: "file://C:\Documents and Settings\_____\Desktop\lame3.96.1\Layla.mp3" (0)
INFO (foo_bitcompare) : location: "file://C:\Documents and Settings\_____\Desktop\lame-3.96.1\Layla.mp3" (0)
INFO (foo_bitcompare) : No differences in decoded data found.
INFO (foo_bitcompare) : Finished successfully.


Here's my speed test, the values fluctuate each time I run them probably because of other things eating up CPU time, but there is no clear winner. I would venture to say whatever different flags used have no effect on anything, at all.

CODE
Rarewares: 7.9299x
Mitiok: 8.0164x

Rarewares: 7.9505x
Mitiok: 7.9442x

Rarewares: 7.8996x
Mitiok: 7.9916x


EDIT: This is on a P4, AMD tests may be different.

This post has been edited by Tropican: Jul 10 2005, 19:47
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DickxLaurent
post Jul 16 2005, 23:42
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 144
Joined: 7-April 04
From: Florida
Member No.: 13283



So negligible differences in speed, basically...

I assume anyone would agree?


--------------------
"The way we see our world is better than yours."
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd August 2014 - 02:53