IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
WMA VBR compared to the ALT-PRESET STANDARD
TurboFox
post May 17 2005, 12:46
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 16-May 05
From: Va
Member No.: 22104



My currnet music library is encoded all in WMA VBR 135-215Kbps. I am thinking I dont have the best of hearing..but for those of you that do. Is it possible to hear a difference between WMA VBR@135-215 and a LAME MP3 encoded at the ALT-PRESET standard?
As for DRM issues and compatibility..I have only had issues with the music I downloaded from microsoft with DRM and compatibility my car stereo plays both as does my portable music player.Thanks for any advice.

This post has been edited by TurboFox: May 17 2005, 12:52
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Acid8000
post May 17 2005, 13:38
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 14-May 05
From: Sydney
Member No.: 22048



If you can't hear a difference then it doesnt really matter now hmm?

Well uhh looking at my sig, I can't say much.

This post has been edited by Acid8000: May 17 2005, 13:39


--------------------
Acid8000 aka. PhilDEE
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TurboFox
post May 17 2005, 13:51
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 16-May 05
From: Va
Member No.: 22104



QUOTE (Acid8000 @ May 17 2005, 07:38 AM)
If you can't hear a difference then it doesnt really matter now hmm?

Well uhh looking at my sig, I can't say much.
*



Your probably right..but knowing that theres a better compression method tends to make me overly paranoid about the quality of my music. Not only that, my logitech Z640 speakers are far from anything high end. I encoded some Led Zepplin this morning on alt-preset extreme and ended up with smaller files then compared to the same songs compresed VIA WMA VBR (overall lower ~bitrate) unsure.gif
I supose for me its peace of mind knowing that my music is compressed while maintaining the best quality. I was just curious who here and hear the difference? And if so what audibly different?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
de Mon
post May 17 2005, 13:59
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 474
Joined: 1-December 02
Member No.: 3940



QUOTE (Acid8000 @ May 17 2005, 04:38 AM)
If you can't hear a difference then it doesnt really matter now hmm?
*


Hmm, it can matter if TurboFox uses not good speakers now and will change it for something better in future. Anyway I think ther is no listenable difference on EASY samples. I don't think you are listening to HARD samples like 'fatboy' or 'castanets' all the time you drive the car. wink.gif


--------------------
Ogg Vorbis for music and speech [q-2.0 - q6.0]
FLAC for recordings to be edited
Speex for speech
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stephanV
post May 17 2005, 15:22
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 394
Joined: 6-May 04
Member No.: 13932



If you are paranoid, go lossless. If you're not, then why should you care if you don't here the difference?


--------------------
"We cannot win against obsession. They care, we don't. They win."
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TurboFox
post May 17 2005, 22:04
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 16-May 05
From: Va
Member No.: 22104



QUOTE (stephanV @ May 17 2005, 09:22 AM)
If you are paranoid, go lossless. If you're not, then why should you care if you don't here the difference?
*



dry.gif Ok....I'm wanting the best quality/compression threfore I'm not just going lossless and calling it a day. I care because
QUOTE
peace of mind knowing that my music is compressed while maintaining the best quality
and as de Mon stated
QUOTE
Hmm, it can matter if TurboFox uses not good speakers now and will change it for something better in future. Anyway I think ther is no listenable difference on EASY samples. I don't think you are listening to HARD samples like 'fatboy' or 'castanets' all the time you drive the car. wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stephanV
post May 17 2005, 23:36
Post #7





Group: Members
Posts: 394
Joined: 6-May 04
Member No.: 13932



(note: I don't use lossless myself)

I'm sorry, but the best quality is lossless. It is the only way of assuring all of your rips sound good.

If you are asking if it is possible to hear a difference between WMA VBR and LAME APS, the answer is: for some people, yes. Is LAME APS always transparent: not for all people.

But what is audibly different for you? No one knows...


--------------------
"We cannot win against obsession. They care, we don't. They win."
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th December 2014 - 17:56