IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

LAME 4.0 alpha 13 CLI encoder for TESTING ONLY 20
lithoc
post Feb 28 2005, 20:30
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 9-January 02
Member No.: 963



I've notice something new on rarewares.

Just FYI,

I'm doing some encoding now, only for testing purposes of course wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
john33
post Mar 15 2005, 16:34
Post #2


xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 3760
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Bracknell, UK
Member No.: 111



Before there are any other comments, this is there for your own appreciation only. Neither Takehiro, nor any of the other lame-devs, is directly interested in any testing you may do at this time.

There is no Change Log, or any other relevant documentation. LAME 4.0 is virtually a total rewrite, so little if any of the work done on 3.9x will go forward.

So, have some fun with it, but don't even consider using it for any other purpose. wink.gif


--------------------
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lyx
post Mar 16 2005, 15:54
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 3353
Joined: 6-July 03
From: Sachsen (DE)
Member No.: 7609



QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 15 2005, 05:34 PM)
LAME 4.0 is virtually a total rewrite, so little if any of the work done on 3.9x will go forward.


If thats the case, then i wonder: Looking at the promising test-results of the upcoming 3.97, wouldn't it make sense - after 3.97 got finished - to say "okay, thats it - the 3.9x series reached its limits - now lets focus all efforts on lame4" ?

I mean, if 3.97 turns out as good as it seems, then we would have a tuned, stable and good 3.97 - a perfect point to abandon the 3.9x series (except of possible bugfixes) and focus all energy on lame4 because all work on the 3.9x series cannot be "ported" to the future of lame(4).

I'm kinda curious on whats the strategy of the lame-devs on this matter.

- Lyx

This post has been edited by Lyx: Mar 16 2005, 15:54


--------------------
I am arrogant and I can afford it because I deliver.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- lithoc   LAME 4.0 alpha 13 CLI encoder for TESTING ONLY 20   Feb 28 2005, 20:30
- - earphiler   i can't find this on the rarewares. strange?   Feb 28 2005, 21:40
|- - rjamorim   QUOTE (earphiler @ Feb 28 2005, 05:40 PM)i ca...   Feb 28 2005, 21:56
|- - Lyx   QUOTE (rjamorim @ Feb 28 2005, 10:56 PM)QUOTE...   Feb 28 2005, 22:07
- - earphiler   sorry about that/ i never wouldn't looked towa...   Feb 28 2005, 22:03
- - john33   Some may recall that I posted alpha 12 a while bac...   Feb 28 2005, 22:08
|- - OldSkoOL   I tested this out last night and was suprised how ...   Mar 1 2005, 14:07
|- - AtaqueEG   QUOTE (OldSkoOL @ Mar 1 2005, 07:07 AM)I test...   Mar 1 2005, 14:38
|- - rjamorim   QUOTE (AtaqueEG @ Mar 1 2005, 10:38 AM)Might ...   Mar 1 2005, 15:21
|- - Jojo   QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 1 2005, 06:21 AM)QUOTE ...   Mar 1 2005, 21:09
|- - OldSkoOL   Thing is there seems to be no documentation or bui...   Mar 1 2005, 21:13
|- - rjamorim   QUOTE (OldSkoOL @ Mar 1 2005, 05:13 PM)Thing ...   Mar 1 2005, 21:17
|- - OldSkoOL   QUOTE (rjamorim @ Mar 1 2005, 02:17 PM)Move o...   Mar 1 2005, 21:22
|- - robert   QUOTE (OldSkoOL @ Mar 1 2005, 09:22 PM)QUOTE ...   Mar 1 2005, 22:12
- - westgroveg   I tested 4.0 against 3.90.3 & 3.96.1 on only 3...   Mar 1 2005, 14:13
- - john33   I can't believe the fuss this has generated...   Mar 1 2005, 22:17
|- - uart   QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 1 2005, 01:17 PM)I can...   Mar 15 2005, 15:44
- - BoNeLeSS   Move Along, citizens. There's Nothing to See H...   Mar 1 2005, 23:05
|- - henkersmahlzeit   QUOTE (BoNeLeSS @ Mar 1 2005, 02:05 PM)Move A...   Mar 2 2005, 00:23
- - IGOR][X   QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 1 2005, 10:17 PM)I can...   Mar 10 2005, 00:28
- - john33   Before there are any other comments, this is there...   Mar 15 2005, 16:34
|- - Lyx   QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 15 2005, 05:34 PM)LAME 4....   Mar 16 2005, 15:54
|- - jaybeee   QUOTE (Lyx @ Mar 16 2005, 02:54 PM)QUOTE (joh...   Mar 16 2005, 17:05
- - kindofblue   QUOTE (john33 @ Mar 15 2005, 07:34 AM)LAME 4....   Mar 16 2005, 05:04
|- - OldSkoOL   At first its amazingly fast but then the fun ends.   Mar 16 2005, 15:34
- - manuelator   i tried the lame 4 alpha 14, and it's really f...   Aug 18 2005, 01:37
- - Roobar   I decided to use Lame4.0a14 to re-rip and encode G...   Apr 10 2006, 00:16
|- - skelly831   QUOTE (Roobar @ Apr 9 2006, 04:16 PM) I d...   Apr 10 2006, 00:27
|- - Roobar   QUOTE (skelly831 @ Apr 10 2006, 09:27 AM)...   Apr 10 2006, 05:45
- - odyssey   Does anyone have en idea of when lame 4.0 MIGHT be...   Apr 10 2006, 13:18
- - DigitalDictator   QUOTE Not entirely happy with the 3.97b2 encode us...   Apr 10 2006, 13:37
|- - AtaqueEG   QUOTE (DigitalDictator @ Apr 10 2006, 06...   Apr 10 2006, 13:49
|- - Roobar   QUOTE (DigitalDictator @ Apr 10 2006, 10...   Apr 10 2006, 14:57
- - guruboolez   It would be nice to have more details. You said th...   Apr 10 2006, 13:50
- - dev0   It's not a matter of being mean, but of provin...   Apr 10 2006, 15:15
- - woody_woodward   QUOTE (dev0 @ Apr 10 2006, 06:15 AM) It...   Apr 10 2006, 17:30
- - Jebus   QUOTE (woody_woodward @ Apr 10 2006, 08:3...   Apr 10 2006, 17:59
- - woody_woodward   QUOTE (Jebus @ Apr 10 2006, 08:59 AM) QUO...   Apr 10 2006, 20:13
- - AtaqueEG   QUOTE (woody_woodward @ Apr 10 2006, 01:1...   Apr 11 2006, 04:15


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd September 2014 - 07:41