IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

WHY a particular LAME version, ?
moorex
post Dec 17 2004, 21:30
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 17-December 04
Member No.: 18738



I have read quite a lot stuff on the net recommending the 3.90.3 ver. of the LAME encoder. Why is it better than the newer versions?
please post some detailed info


--------------------
Increase the Peace!!!
Integrated audio, soon Audigy 2! 2x40HDDs, soon 1x40 & 1x250GB! 5.1 Luxeon speakers. DAP: XClef HD-500 FW 5.323
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
music_man_mpc
post Dec 17 2004, 21:55
Post #2





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 707
Joined: 20-July 03
From: Canada
Member No.: 7895



The presets (--alt-preset xxx) for the 3.90.X branch of LAME were designed by many of the original members of this site and were exhaustively tested to make sure that they utilized the best possible settings for quality. Subsequent versions of LAME broke compatibility with these presets to allow for many other improvements (faster, bug issues, etc), thus making a temporary regression in quality. LAME 3.96.1 seemed as though it might be about the same quality as 3.90.3 in some of the tests done after it was released. However, in the minds of the administration of this forum it has not yet been tested extensively enough, thus 3.90.3 is still the recommended version. LAME 3.96.1 has been proven to be of superior quality for some bitrates where there are no VBR presets for 3.90.3, only ABR. Thus 3.90.3 --alt-preset standard is considered to be better than 3.96.1 -V 2 (--preset standard) but 3.96.1 -V 5 (approximatly 128kb/s) is better then 3.90.3 --alt-preset 128. It is also worth noting that 3.96.1 is at least twice as fast as 3.90.3 for encoding and that -V 2 produces slightly smaller files then --alt-preset standard.

edit: typos

This post has been edited by music_man_mpc: Dec 20 2004, 22:00


--------------------
gentoo ~amd64 + layman | ncmpcpp/mpd | wavpack + vorbis + lame
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
odious malefacto...
post Dec 20 2004, 21:54
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 253
Joined: 17-June 03
Member No.: 7228



QUOTE (music_man_mpc @ Dec 17 2004, 12:55 PM)
LAME 3.96.3 has been proven to be of superior quality for some bitrates. . .

edit: typos
*


Since this is now linked to the FAQ, please correct this (one more) typo. . . .
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
music_man_mpc
post Dec 20 2004, 22:00
Post #4





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 707
Joined: 20-July 03
From: Canada
Member No.: 7895



QUOTE (odious malefactor @ Dec 20 2004, 12:54 PM)
QUOTE (music_man_mpc @ Dec 17 2004, 12:55 PM)
LAME 3.96.3 has been proven to be of superior quality for some bitrates. . .

edit: typos
*


Since this is now linked to the FAQ, please correct this (one more) typo. . . .
*

Thanks for pointing that out odious.


--------------------
gentoo ~amd64 + layman | ncmpcpp/mpd | wavpack + vorbis + lame
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd July 2014 - 11:28