IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Objective way of measuring audio quality?
Raiden
post Sep 14 2004, 19:06
Post #1





Group: Developer
Posts: 224
Joined: 14-September 04
Member No.: 17002



Hi,

I want to measure the quality of audio codecs, but I want an absolute objective way to do that (No listening tests).
Some (or everybody) of you will say that the most important thing is to measure how the file really SOUNDS, but I am curious about objective measurement.
Is there any tool or method which is able to do that?

Thanks in advance
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dibrom
post Sep 14 2004, 19:56
Post #2


Founder


Group: Admin
Posts: 2958
Joined: 26-August 02
From: Nottingham, UK
Member No.: 1



Hi. Please check out the FAQ, as it addresses some of this.

So-called "objective" methods of measuring sound quality are basically useless with respect to the way in which most of the lossy codecs discussed here work.

There have been some tools which attempt to objectively measure sound quality via some sort of perceptual model, but most of them have proven to give inaccurate results in many cases.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MugFunky
post Sep 15 2004, 05:11
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 493
Joined: 28-December 03
From: Melbourne, Aus
Member No.: 10767



a properly conducted listening test (with enough participants) is completely objective.

what better human perceptual model is there but actual human hearing?

although, i concede that when there are clear differences to be heard, judging what is a better "sound" can be a difficult task. but aesthetics cannot be objective by definition, so it's nothing to worry about.

imagine a scientific test to determine if a piece of art is "good" or not... critics would go out of business.

This post has been edited by MugFunky: Sep 15 2004, 05:13
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AstralStorm
post Oct 3 2004, 20:01
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 745
Joined: 22-April 03
From: /dev/null
Member No.: 6130



Easy to do, one just would need ABC/HR for images with 1-1000 scale.
Of course, critics are most probably biased, so you'd need to throw in some reproductions to fool them.


--------------------
ruxvilti'a
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd August 2014 - 04:50