IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Training my ears for listening tests?
Axon
post Feb 7 2004, 20:50
Post #1





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 1984
Joined: 4-January 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 10933



I'm starting to get interested about doing listening tests, as I have now invested enough in my system to not worry about upgrades for a while, plus I would very much like to use these tools for the forces of good. But unfortunately I'm deaf and dumb when it comes to spotting encoding errors - I played around with LAME 96kbps transcodes from foobar a few days ago, and I was unable to A/B one sample from the original, and ABXing an easier one was very doable but tougher than I would have expected.

Does anybody have suggestions for the best way to train my ears for listening tests? I'm aware of Arny's old site but the last time I tried to download all the samples quite a few were missing. Otherwise I intend on doing what I have been doing, which is to keep testing at the threshold of audible differences between samples, and perhaps download listening test samples and compare my results with those of others.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dologan
post Feb 8 2004, 03:46
Post #2





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 478
Joined: 22-November 01
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 519



Check ff123's page. It's a great resource. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
atherean
post Feb 8 2004, 04:06
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 87
Joined: 23-September 01
Member No.: 10



This doesn't really answer your question, but I'd say if your not sensitive to encoding artifacts, keep it that way, and get some musical training instead.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cutter
post Apr 7 2004, 11:36
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 266
Joined: 3-December 03
Member No.: 10152



What do you mean by "musical training"?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
shadowking
post Apr 7 2004, 12:04
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 1523
Joined: 31-January 04
Member No.: 11664



Encode a file at low bitrate 32-64k at these bitrates artefacts will be easily heard by you without abx. Now abx these files even if its easy so you get the feel for the proceadure and artefacts. WHen you are bored try raising the bitrate to 96k and so forth... Be patient and do these tests at night when its quite + try to use good earphones.

When I started I couldn't abx anything at 128k. After a few days I found the 1st problem sample. Now it doesn't take me long to find faults at 128k and sometimes higher bitrates. You are right it is tougher than you first anticipate and I wouldn't be suprised if many so called audiophiles fail to abx lame 128k.


--------------------
Wavpack -b450
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st August 2014 - 07:47