IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

128 kbps Listening Test (Testers Needed)
soltari1
post Feb 3 2004, 06:30
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 4-October 03
Member No.: 9155



My friend and I are doing a science fair project on lossy compression. (we are high schoolers if you care) The purpose of this project is to show people that 128kbps is not cd quality despite what the media tells them. This test is concieved as an update to rjamorim's extension test using newer versions of the nero aac and ogg encoders. (We'd like to thank rjamorim for providing a link to the test samples and for the inspiration biggrin.gif )

We are more interested in the abx results of your tests than on the 5 point rating that each format is given because it is less discretionary, (there either is a difference or isn't) but if someone more knowledgeable could provide a little bit more info about why most testers seem to prefer the 5 point scale we could change it.

We are running a parallel 64 kbps test among people at our school, but because they are not audiophiles and can barely notice a difference at this setting we do not feel they contribute meaningfull to the 128kbps test.

We have already prepared all of the files (encoded and then decoded to wav) and test files for use in ABC-HR. To take the test go to Music.Black2d.com. Once we have finished collating the data all results will be available on the site.

Thank you in advance for any contributions you can provide.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
AtaqueEG
post Feb 3 2004, 07:45
Post #2





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 1336
Joined: 18-November 01
From: Celaya, Guanajuato
Member No.: 478



QUOTE (WILU @ Feb 3 2004, 12:12 AM)
Look here:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/show.php/showtopic/17563/st/0
There is an mp3 listening test at 128kbs. Maybe you and your friend could join?

1.- That test ended monday at 00:00 hrs

2.- soltari1 wants to test different encoders (you know, different formats) against a source reference. He is not trying to test encoders directly against themselves to pick a winner.

Such a test would be very exhausting, IMHO, because you would have to use the same people to test every encoder, so the test would be more valid to prove the point you seem to want to make: that no encoder is "CD-quality" (transparent) at that bitrate. And I venture to say that some samples WILL be transparent to some people, so you would need to use more than one sample to prove your point. Have you found people to sit through 10-12 tests? (5-6 encoders, 1-2 samples) If you have, please BY ALL MEANS go ahead, and don't forget to let us know your results.

That is why Roberto's system is better (and even that one seems to be exhausting, from what I have read)

smile.gif


--------------------
I'm the one in the picture, sitting on a giant cabbage in Mexico, circa 1978.
Reseņas de Rock en Espaņol: www.estadogeneral.com
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st December 2014 - 02:55