IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules

- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
I hate to get out of HA..., What would you tell this guy O_o
ilikedirtthe2nd
post Jun 17 2003, 19:49
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 26-October 01
From: Germany
Member No.: 352



he, i just wanted to say: i really like this place here... audio discussion on other forums makes me headache laugh.gif

http://de.europe.creative.com/support/foru...&foru=12&page=1

regards; ilikedirt

This post has been edited by ilikedirtthe2nd: Jun 17 2003, 19:50
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Atlantis
post Jun 17 2003, 20:18
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 250
Joined: 27-December 02
From: ROMA, Italy
Member No.: 4269



"I don't need to read anything and I am not wrong."

mad.gif


--------------------
Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by spontaneously moving from where you left them to where you can't find them.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ilikedirtthe2nd
post Jun 17 2003, 20:29
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 26-October 01
From: Germany
Member No.: 352



QUOTE (Atlantis @ Jun 17 2003 - 07:18 PM)
"I don't need to read anything and I am not wrong."

mad.gif

you see what i mean, he? wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ilikedirtthe2nd
post Jun 17 2003, 20:32
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 26-October 01
From: Germany
Member No.: 352



this is even better:

QUOTE
I've read the links, and I've read similar before.

The problem is that listening tests are subjective and the result varies on the pair of ears listening. A true scientific test (a waveform comparison), balanced with scientific information about frequency response in the ear is the only common sense way to test.


i don't think, he actually read the links (and understood what he saw...) sad.gif

how can one alone be *that* ignorant dry.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ff123
post Jun 18 2003, 01:47
Post #5


ABC/HR developer, ff123.net admin


Group: Developer (Donating)
Posts: 1396
Joined: 24-September 01
Member No.: 12



Nice reply to the thread on the other board, JohnV.

ff123
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Atlantis
post Jun 18 2003, 08:23
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 250
Joined: 27-December 02
From: ROMA, Italy
Member No.: 4269



QUOTE (ilikedirtthe2nd @ Jun 17 2003 - 08:29 PM)
QUOTE (Atlantis @ Jun 17 2003 - 07:18 PM)
"I don't need to read anything and I am not wrong."

mad.gif

you see what i mean, he? wink.gif

Yeah, the Dark Age of audio compression


--------------------
Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by spontaneously moving from where you left them to where you can't find them.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lev
post Jun 18 2003, 09:03
Post #7





Group: Members
Posts: 524
Joined: 7-November 02
From: Gloucester, UK
Member No.: 3716



HUGE thumbs up to JohnV for posting that... Thats the sort of thing I imagine most people could never be bothered to do.

Seriously, that amount of effort is very commendable. wink.gif


--------------------
http://www.megalev.co.uk
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
indybrett
post Jun 18 2003, 12:29
Post #8





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 1354
Joined: 4-March 02
From: Indianapolis, IN
Member No.: 1440



QUOTE (ff123 @ Jun 17 2003 - 07:47 PM)
Nice reply to the thread on the other board, JohnV.

ff123

So good in fact that I'm going to task myself with memorizing (and learning) the entire text of it.


--------------------
flac>fb2k>kernel streaming>audiophile 2496>magni>dt990 pro
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
userXYZ
post Jun 18 2003, 12:48
Post #9





Group: Members
Posts: 155
Joined: 12-October 02
Member No.: 3538



QUOTE
So good in fact that I'm going to task myself with memorizing (and learning) the entire text of it.

yepp, me too. Besides, nice avatar, indybrett. Did you make i yourself?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ilikedirtthe2nd
post Jun 18 2003, 18:38
Post #10





Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 26-October 01
From: Germany
Member No.: 352



QUOTE
JohnV: Thanks for the post. I have read a lot on the topic before and do understand a lot of the background to this.

I still think that a waveform comparison, albeit skewed for frequency response and obviously taken over time, is a much more accurate test.

Of course MP3 is a lossy format. The critical thing is how much redundant data can you remove, but still create a waveform that is as similar as possible to the original (with frequency skew). Listening tests are interesting, but suffer from all sorts of issues statistically speaking.


omg dry.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nyarlathotep
post Jun 18 2003, 19:34
Post #11





Group: Members
Posts: 412
Joined: 13-April 03
From: Haut-Médoc FRA
Member No.: 5943



QUOTE
JohnV: Thanks for the post. I have read a lot on the topic before and do understand a lot of the background to this.

I still think that a waveform comparison, albeit skewed for frequency response and obviously taken over time, is a much more accurate test.

Of course MP3 is a lossy format. The critical thing is how much redundant data can you remove, but still create a waveform that is as similar as possible to the original (with frequency skew). Listening tests are interesting, but suffer from all sorts of issues statistically speaking.


There isn't much more we can do...
So sad
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
indybrett
post Jun 18 2003, 20:37
Post #12





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 1354
Joined: 4-March 02
From: Indianapolis, IN
Member No.: 1440



QUOTE (userXYZ @ Jun 18 2003 - 06:48 AM)
Besides, nice avatar, indybrett. Did you make i yourself?

Nope. But I did fix it up a little.


--------------------
flac>fb2k>kernel streaming>audiophile 2496>magni>dt990 pro
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Pio2001
post Jun 18 2003, 21:26
Post #13


Moderator


Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 3936
Joined: 29-September 01
Member No.: 73



Something we can do ? Post some sceen captures of waveforms and ask him which one looks best biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bluewer than blu...
post Jun 19 2003, 00:20
Post #14





Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 6-March 02
Member No.: 1450



And I was wondering where's Roel been lately...now I know! blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ViPER1313
post Jun 19 2003, 05:42
Post #15





Group: Members
Posts: 271
Joined: 19-August 02
From: Maryland
Member No.: 3109



Will someone please tell these people to use LAME v3.92 and test the following two command-lines against the original .wav, and then tell them to eat their words -

"-V0 -q9 -b128 -B128 -md -p --noshort --notemp --nores --strictly-enforce-ISO --ns-bass 2 --ns-alto 12 --ns-treble 9 -k"

and then....

"--alt-preset 128" (Both without quotes, of course rolleyes.gif - Just looking out for people on the creative forum)

The first command line LOOKS so much better in the spectral view tongue.gif . That's the one I should use, right? Oh wait - it sounds like crap! I wonder why? Could it be because there is NO lowpass? And no bit reservoir? And dual stereo? And other various "tweaks" biggrin.gif ? Isn't it amazing that --alt-preset 128 sounds so much better, yet "looks" worse? Go figure.........
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AgentMil
post Jun 19 2003, 10:07
Post #16





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 584
Joined: 19-December 01
From: Australia
Member No.: 688



OMG!! If they were right that means all the test that have been performed in the world would be invalid then? biggrin.gif

I hope posting that link on there doesn't bring those types of people here onto Hydrogen Audio. I think WE all know what sort of trouble that brought last time. I personally only come here to browse and sometimes participate due to heavy work and education commitments I don't the time to do all the nice interactive things that HA is known for!! wink.gif But all the hard work of the new members and old members are very much appreciated by myself and most probably a lot of other people! I been using MusePack ever since I was introduced to the format via this forum. I also use all the other codecs on a need to use basis especially for car stereos sad.gif only can playback MP3s.

Anyways I love the replys given by both JohnV and ff123 brilliant rebuttal cause all they can say now is scientifically valid results held in a controlled environment and nothing else to support their claims and their seemingly objective method of testing (I am pretty sure if someone had the time they can create a waveform that can look pictorially similar to a track but sound completely different). SSR can go back and support and help people with their Nomads IMHO, it seems that all he seems to have time for, if he was inclined reading those links would of at least make him learn a few things about audio coding.

Heres to more proper test held by people that we know and trust. biggrin.gif

Laters
AgentMil


--------------------
-=MusePack... Living Audio Compression=-

Honda - The Power of Dreams
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2Bdecided
post Jun 19 2003, 10:31
Post #17


ReplayGain developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 5364
Joined: 5-November 01
From: Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 409



I see http links to images appear in-line without you asking on that board. That makes for a dramatic looking post that I didn't intend!

Cheers,
David.


PS - of course, we all know that we're wasting our time over there - it's a creative message board after all! wink.gif A triumph of marketing over reality - why let facts get in the way? rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by 2Bdecided: Jun 19 2003, 10:33
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JohnV
post Jun 19 2003, 15:46
Post #18





Group: Developer
Posts: 2797
Joined: 22-September 01
Member No.: 6



QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Jun 19 2003 - 12:31 PM)
PS - of course, we all know that we're wasting our time over there - it's a creative message board after all! wink.gif

Yeah, but next time we can copy-paste that text we wrote for the next "genius".. laugh.gif


--------------------
Juha Laaksonheimo
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2Bdecided
post Jun 19 2003, 16:18
Post #19


ReplayGain developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 5364
Joined: 5-November 01
From: Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 409



QUOTE (JohnV @ Jun 19 2003 - 02:46 PM)
Yeah, but next time we can copy-paste that text we wrote for the next "genius"..  laugh.gif

laugh.gif

I had chapter 2 of my thesis on-line as html for these arguments, but lost it when I left uni. Must sort my web page out one day... unsure.gif

D.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gabriel
post Jun 19 2003, 16:40
Post #20


LAME developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 2950
Joined: 1-October 01
From: Nanterre, France
Member No.: 138



If I remember well, your thesis is on mp3-tech.org (but in pdf)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2Bdecided
post Jun 19 2003, 16:50
Post #21


ReplayGain developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 5364
Joined: 5-November 01
From: Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 409



QUOTE (Gabriel @ Jun 19 2003 - 03:40 PM)
If I remember well, your thesis is on mp3-tech.org (but in pdf)

Yes, and I sent him there. But it's a 19MB download - heck - I wouldn't bother with that, so I don't see why he should!

Cheers,
David.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Pio2001
post Jun 19 2003, 22:58
Post #22


Moderator


Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 3936
Joined: 29-September 01
Member No.: 73



QUOTE (ViPER1313 @ Jun 19 2003 - 07:42 AM)
Will someone please tell these people to use LAME v3.92 and test the following two command-lines against the original .wav, and then tell them to eat their words -

Why don't you do it yourself ? Anyway, I don't think it would convince him, because JohnV already talked about spectral views, and he answered that waveform comparison was better than spectrum comparison. We should find a sample that sounds better when the amount of noise resulting from the substraction of the original from the copy is bigger (substraction = differences between the waveforms).
I'm not interested in doing this, because if he wasn't convinced by JohnV's explanation, he won't be with another example, and will answer that it's just an isolate case chosen on purpose, and that for normal music, the less difference there is, the better the quality. And actually this may be true quite often.
QUOTE (AgentMil @ Jun 19 2003 - 12:07 PM)
I hope posting that link on there doesn't bring those types of people here onto Hydrogen Audio. I think WE all know what sort of trouble that brought last time.

I don't agree, I don't think we should be disappointed by anyone coming into HA. OK, fruitless discussions are a pain, but people with different beliefs should not be. It should not cause any problem if we answer with accurate and pertinent arguments, strictly technical, and not wander into the personal domain.
Well I know sometimes that there are people who are not interested in discussing (so called trolls), but I never assume someone is a troll without having tried to discuss first.

In this case, it is sad that these comments are done here "in their back" instead of there. But I let this rest, since I can't handle several forums at once, and JohnV and him have both clearly stated their positions, and i think JohnV's one is more convincing, thanks to the arguments provided.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ViPER1313
post Jun 20 2003, 02:29
Post #23





Group: Members
Posts: 271
Joined: 19-August 02
From: Maryland
Member No.: 3109



QUOTE (Pio2001 @ Jun 19 2003 - 05:58 PM)
Why don't you do it yourself ? Anyway, I don't think it would convince him, because JohnV already talked about spectral views, and he answered that waveform comparison was better than spectrum comparison. We should find a sample that sounds better when the amount of noise resulting from the substraction of the original from the copy is bigger (substraction = differences between the waveforms).
I'm not interested in doing this, because if he wasn't convinced by JohnV's explanation, he won't be with another example, and will answer that it's just an isolate case chosen on purpose, and that for normal music, the less difference there is, the better the quality. And actually this may be true quite often.


I didn't post it myself because the forum itself is in German.... dry.gif . I just thought that an easy to hear, real life example that proved the exact opposite of what people were saying might have helped. I guess I will have to give my 'Benutzername" and "Kennwort" and sign up to post laugh.gif . If people say it's an isolated case, oh well, it still flies in the face of what has been said.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2Bdecided
post Jun 20 2003, 10:23
Post #24


ReplayGain developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 5364
Joined: 5-November 01
From: Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 409



If you compare a recent codec (e.g. AAC) with an older one (e.g. mp2), you will get a general rule, rather than an isolated case. You'll find that the newer codec can be transparent whilst adding much more measurable noise than the older codec.

It's easy to find bitrates where the measured noise added by each codec is similar, but AAC sounds basically transparent, while mp2 sounds terrible.

This shows the absolute folly of relying on waveform comparison.


I'm posting here (behind his back) because I don't hink Creative would be appreciative of all our comments! More importantly, I've had a terrible internet problem this week where HA and Google are about the only sites I can reach most of the time. Most others come up with "The page cannot be displayed" so quickly that I'm sure my PC isn't even trying! It's getting so bad that I'm actually going to have to do something about it!

Cheers,
David.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
penvzila
post Jun 20 2003, 21:07
Post #25





Group: Members
Posts: 157
Joined: 16-August 02
From: 地獄
Member No.: 3077



I actually learned a lot from that post.


--------------------
地獄
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th December 2014 - 18:39