IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Help me w/ maths for decelerating attack curves + predicting durations, i.e. I am noob and what curve is this, how it relates to a basal dBU/s
db1989
post Apr 29 2013, 12:42
Post #1





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 5275
Joined: 23-June 06
Member No.: 32180



Preface: As tends to happen whenever I start writing, this got out of control quite quickly. I’m going to refrain from deleting much lest I make my core thoughts even more difficult to follow, but I’ve emboldened what I think are my key points – if I can be said to have any at all…

I’ve started quantifying parameters of a hardware synthesiser for reference and comparison, and just maybe the future design of an emulator.

What is baking my brain is the attack phase of the envelope. Decay was easy to quantify and proceeds by a constant number of dBU/s that scales exponentially with the rate chosen; in other words, decay is linear on a scale of dBU. Attack, on the other hand, is apparently modelled on observations that natural instruments often have exponential attacks. Accordingly, attack is claimed to follow an inverted version of the decay curve but multiplied by a factor that depends upon the instantaneous distance between (current level) and (target level). In other words, on a logarithmic scale, the curve initially rises quite steeply but then progressively becomes shallower as the level approaches its final value.

My lack of skill with mathematics probably means I’m confusing things with a lot of vague descriptions and inconsistent/misnamed terminology, but I did manage to mess around enough to obtain something that resembles the curve I’m talking about. It looks like this:

CODE
y = x * (1 + (1 - x))
0 <= x <= 1
0 <= y <= 1
Which gives this:

Which looks similar enough, at least for now, to the curve formed by the amplitude of the attacking waveform when the latter is viewed on a logarithmic scale.

This is probably some bog-standard type of curve/formula/relationship, but my novice Googlin’ didn’t reveal anything except the logarithmic curve, which seems to decelerate more slowly and asymptotically, rather than finally reaching 1 as this formula does. I presume this formula, or perhaps its more conventional representation if there is one, can easily be adapted for differing scales of the variables on both axes.

At the moment, I’m most interested in predicting the mean rate of amplification and hence the duration. This would be more immediately useful for reference and, probably, would also be beneficial for later attempts to model the curve accurately. Perhaps predicting the mean dB/s specifically requires such a model, which is where these questions come in!

So, as I confess to not being mathematically minded at all (at least that I’m aware), I need advice from those who are. Given that the curve representing the attack is likely to be a transformation of decay, which is based on some multiplication of the decay rate with deceleration as (current level) approaches (final level), is there a way to calculate a factor by which (mean rate of decelerating attack over a given range of dBU) will = (some mystical factor) ◊ (measured rate of linear decay)? Maybe itís as simple as substituting in the relevant starting and finishing values on the y-axis and deriving from there, but Iím already out of my depth as it stands, as you can probably tell. Or does deriving the mean change in dBU between any given pair of points (also in dBU) require consideration of the entire curve, e.g. calculus or something baffling like that?

My tests so far suggest that, unlike with the decay, the distance in dBU between (starting level) and (final level) factors into the rate of attack. I can’t see any obvious relationship in the numbers between (distance in dB) and (factor by which to multiply the corresponding rate of decay), at least to a mathematical layman such as myself. I guess the bulk of my question is – assuming the rate of a decelerating curve can be converted to a mean value, which is a proposition I can’t possibly evaluate as a novice – how/whether the (hypothetical) mean rate of increase can be derived from the defined distance in dBU, given the basal unit of change in amplitude per second of the decay.

Excuse the lack of specifics, but I’m proceeding on the basis, or just hope, that the relationship is based solely upon the shape of the curve (yet to be confirmed) and the basal unit of dB/s (from the decay of the ‘same’ [but, obviously, actually not] rate), so I presumed a tonne of measurements in seconds would not be useful here.

Summary: Assuming the attack is vaguely reminiscent of a decelerating curve like the above (the hardware probably approximates it in a peculiar way, if previous findings are anything to go by), is there a way to calculate the factor by which it relates to the underlying linear decay upon which it is apparently based? In other words (I think wacko.gif), I want to be able to calculate the mean rate of attack that corresponds to a given rate of decay (and hence the duration of said attack phase, etc.).

Thanks a lot to anyone who has the mental power and/or masochism to have read this far! Guidance for a hopeless non-mathematician will be greatly appreciated.

This post has been edited by db1989: Apr 29 2013, 14:04
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Woodinville
post May 1 2013, 21:40
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 1402
Joined: 9-January 05
From: JJ's office.
Member No.: 18957



is K( 1 - e ^ (-at)) the function you were looking for?


--------------------
-----
J. D. (jj) Johnston
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd October 2014 - 06:19