IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Pqf Specs
wkw
post Aug 27 2002, 05:40
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 7-June 02
Member No.: 2241



Hi,

I am wondering if someone could verify for me if I got the right info for the AAC pqf filterbank. I only have the MPEG4 Final Committee Draft copy and I am not sure if there are any mistakes in the Final specs.

The 48 Q coefficients:

9.7655291007575512e-05,
-2.2656858741499447E-02,
1.3809589379038567E-04,
-6.8031113858963354E-03,
9.8400749256623534E-05,
1.5085400948280744E-02,
-8.6671544782335723E-05,
3.9750993388272739E-02,
-4.6217998911921346E-04,
6.2445363629436743E-02,
-1.0211814095158174E-03,
7.7622327748721326E-02,
-1.6772149340010668E-03,
7.9968338496132926E-02,
-2.2533338951411081E-03,
6.5615493068475583E-02,
-2.4987888343213967E-03,
3.3313658300882690E-02,
-2.1390815966761882E-03,
-1.4691563058190206E-02,
-9.5595397454597772E-04,
-7.2307890475334147E-02,
1.1172111530118943E-03,
-1.2993222541703875E-01,
3.9091309127348584E-03,
-1.7551641029040532E-01,
6.9635703420118673E-03,
-1.9626543957670528E-01,
9.5595442159478339E-03,
-1.8073330670215029E-01,
1.0815766540021360E-02,
-1.2097653136035738E-01,
9.8770514991715300E-03,
-1.4377370758549035E-02,
6.1562567291327357E-03,
1.3522730742860303E-01,
-4.1793946063629710E-04,
3.1737852699301633E-01,
-9.2128743097707640E-03,
5.1590021798482233E-01,
-1.8830775873369020E-02,
7.1080020379761377E-01,
-2.7226498457701823E-02,
8.8090632488444798E-01,
-3.2022840857588906E-02,
1.0068321641150089E+00,
-3.0996332527754609E-02,
1.0737914947736096E+00

The Analysis filter's cosine modulator :

h[i][n] = 0.25cos((2i + 1)(2n + 5)PI/16)
n = 0,1...96
i=0,1,2,3

The Syntesis filter's cosine modulator :

h[i][n] = cos((2i + 1)(2n - 3)PI/16)
n = 0,1...96
i=0,1,2,3


Thanks

wkw
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
menno
post Aug 27 2002, 16:39
Post #2


Nero MPEG4 developer


Group: Developer (Donating)
Posts: 1218
Joined: 11-October 01
From: LA
Member No.: 267



Ok, didn't feel like comparing, so I copied it from the official spec:

0 9.7655291007575512E-05 24 -2.2656858741499447E-02
1 1.3809589379038567E-04 25 -6.8031113858963354E-03
2 9.8400749256623534E-05 26 1.5085400948280744E-02
3 -8.6671544782335723E-05 27 3.9750993388272739E-02
4 -4.6217998911921346E-04 28 6.2445363629436743E-02
5 -1.0211814095158174E-03 29 7.7622327748721326E-02
6 -1.6772149340010668E-03 30 7.9968338496132926E-02
7 -2.2533338951411081E-03 31 6.5615493068475583E-02
8 -2.4987888343213967E-03 32 3.3313658300882690E-02
9 -2.1390815966761882E-03 33 -1.4691563058190206E-02
10 -9.5595397454597772E-04 34 -7.2307890475334147E-02
11 1.1172111530118943E-03 35 -1.2993222541703875E-01
12 3.9091309127348584E-03 36 -1.7551641029040532E-01
13 6.9635703420118673E-03 37 -1.9626543957670528E-01
14 9.5595442159478339E-03 38 -1.8073330670215029E-01
15 1.0815766540021360E-02 39 -1.2097653136035738E-01
16 9.8770514991715300E-03 40 -1.4377370758549035E-02
17 6.1562567291327357E-03 41 1.3522730742860303E-01
18 -4.1793946063629710E-04 42 3.1737852699301633E-01
19 -9.2128743097707640E-03 43 5.1590021798482233E-01
20 -1.8830775873369020E-02 44 7.1080020379761377E-01
21 -2.7226498457701823E-02 45 8.8090632488444798E-01
22 -3.2022840857588906E-02 46 1.0068321641150089E+00
23 -3.0996332527754609E-02 47 1.0737914947736096E+00

Didn't check if the corrigenda contain corrections to this, but they are available for free.

Synthesis modulator is correct, couldn't find the analisys modulator that fast.

Menno
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wkw
post Aug 27 2002, 17:22
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 7-June 02
Member No.: 2241



thanks

wkw
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wkw
post Oct 25 2002, 20:44
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 7-June 02
Member No.: 2241



MPEG4 AAC -SSR Profile PQF - IPQF coeficients are LOUSY!!!
Could anyone verify my conclusions?


wkw
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
menno
post Oct 25 2002, 21:26
Post #5


Nero MPEG4 developer


Group: Developer (Donating)
Posts: 1218
Joined: 11-October 01
From: LA
Member No.: 267



The order you have them in, in your first post, is wrong.
In my posting the index is in front of the coefficients, just compare (hint: there are 2 columns).

Menno
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st November 2014 - 02:59