Improving LAME - another point of view
Reply #7 – 2002-02-15 22:00:38
Regardless of the exponential nature of system speed (as of present, I still think that optimising the encoding speed is paramount, just as much as quality, and I'm sure the majority of people would agree. Users - in general - fall for the AudioCatalyst selling point, 10x rip and encode on the fly. I've always found it hard to appeal to the general users (I often promote HQ encoding in my workplace - a computer retail shop), when they find that their drives ripping securely take time and the encoding using special presets also takes more time. Lame as of late is taking the right steps! Dibrom's presets have the right mentality - great quality, for the majority, and still Lame has the flexibility for specific environment. Still, however good this is, I have to say I do get frustrated at having to invest so much time to encoding. I know I have the choice to encode at such quality but we the users will always be frustrated at the time things in general take, but we're always pleased when its cut with optimisations. So stay on the right track! Optimise However -- just as an aside, my dream version of LAME would probably be one that would integrate with CD ripping a lot better, regardless of platforms. EAC (the latest beta) is making the right moves, however its still not as seamless and intuitive to the average user. Secure ripping and alt-preset encoding from one application is what I'd like, CDDB, the lot, also with the flexibility to tweak for specific environments. Yes -- I know at the moment, what I want to achieve is achievable but I'd like to think I could point friends at a single application to meet all needs thats INCREDIBLY easy to use. SatCP, r3mix, projectmayhem, dibrom and everyone here have made the transition to good encoding for me quite easy, but I feel what's needed is unification... no tutorials just an easy solution for everyone else I want to get converted.