IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
WMA 9.1 audio settings VBR meanings?
audiomonkeyboy
post Dec 25 2005, 01:48
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 24-December 05
Member No.: 26618



I started messing with dBpowerAMP, and it has a setting for Window Media Audio v9.1 as :

VBR Quality 98, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 90, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 75, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 50, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 25, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 10, 44kHz, stereo VBR

THis might be a stupid question, but are the 98,90,75,50,25,10 some type of percentage of quality of the original?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
boombaard
post Dec 25 2005, 02:09
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 336
Joined: 7-February 05
From: Local Cluster
Member No.: 19647



QUOTE (audiomonkeyboy @ Dec 25 2005, 01:48 AM)
I started messing with dBpowerAMP, and it has a setting for Window Media Audio v9.1 as :

VBR Quality 98, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 90, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 75, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 50, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 25, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 10, 44kHz, stereo VBR

THis might be a stupid question, but are the 98,90,75,50,25,10 some type of percentage of quality of the original?
*


probably.. as i recall MS states that wma offers cd quality at 64kbps, so 98kbps would be overkill there tongue.gif
it's probably just 98% of the 64kbps quality benchmark cool.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
NeoRenegade
post Dec 25 2005, 06:09
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 723
Joined: 29-November 01
Member No.: 563



No.

For some reason, though they claim "CD quality at 64kbps", their 100% quality reference is much higher than 64kbps. It's been so long since I last used WMA, I'm really just guessing here, but I think it was 192kbps.

So much for truth in advertising.

This post has been edited by NeoRenegade: Dec 25 2005, 06:10
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Woodinville
post Jan 10 2006, 23:39
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 1402
Joined: 9-January 05
From: JJ's office.
Member No.: 18957



QUOTE (boombaard @ Dec 24 2005, 05:09 PM)
QUOTE (audiomonkeyboy @ Dec 25 2005, 01:48 AM)
I started messing with dBpowerAMP, and it has a setting for Window Media Audio v9.1 as :

VBR Quality 98, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 90, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 75, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 50, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 25, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 10, 44kHz, stereo VBR

THis might be a stupid question, but are the 98,90,75,50,25,10 some type of percentage of quality of the original?
*


probably.. as i recall MS states that wma offers cd quality at 64kbps, so 98kbps would be overkill there tongue.gif
it's probably just 98% of the 64kbps quality benchmark cool.gif
*



Do you have measurements or evidence to confirm your claim?


--------------------
-----
J. D. (jj) Johnston
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gameplaya15143
post Jan 11 2006, 03:32
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 484
Joined: 8-January 06
From: Earth
Member No.: 26978



QUOTE (audiomonkeyboy @ Dec 24 2005, 07:48 PM)
VBR Quality 98, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 90, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 75, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 50, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 25, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 10, 44kHz, stereo VBR
*

i think they are 'supposed' to represent a % quality.. but they are just high-to-low (or should it say low-to-lower... uh oh.. i better watch out for tos8) settings for vbr. i dont think there is any standard to go by for what 50% quality really means. rolleyes.gif

i've seen quite a few posts from people who use quality 25 for their portable wma players


--------------------
Vorbis-q0-lowpass99
lame3.93.1-q5-V9-k-nspsytune
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
[JAZ]
post Jan 11 2006, 21:40
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 1778
Joined: 24-June 02
From: Catalunya(Spain)
Member No.: 2383



QUOTE (gameplaya15143 @ Jan 11 2006, 03:32 AM)
i think they are 'supposed' to represent a % quality.. but they are just high-to-low (or should it say low-to-lower... uh oh.. i better watch out for tos8)
*



Have you heard problems with a ~240Kbps VBR (Q98) wma 9.1 file to say it is low quality?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Garf
post Jan 14 2006, 10:32
Post #7


Server Admin


Group: Admin
Posts: 4884
Joined: 24-September 01
Member No.: 13



Split listening test discussion.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Madman1153
post Jan 14 2006, 21:36
Post #8





Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 14-July 03
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 7771



QUOTE (audiomonkeyboy @ Dec 24 2005, 04:48 PM)
I started messing with dBpowerAMP, and it has a setting for Window Media Audio v9.1 as :

VBR Quality 98, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 90, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 75, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 50, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 25, 44kHz, stereo VBR
VBR Quality 10, 44kHz, stereo VBR

THis might be a stupid question, but are the 98,90,75,50,25,10 some type of percentage of quality of the original?
*


98% actually produces very large files, almost as large as WMA lossless. I have obtained good results using Q 75, for classical orchestral produces around 160 ~ 180 kbps average, for piano solo depends on volume, can range from 80 to 180 kbps average. Sound quality is good, much less artifacting (beeps, clicks, etc.) than the CBR settings.
I have not tried it for pop music.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th August 2014 - 21:39