IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
better Lame 3.98 (bitrate 128) or 3.93 (bitrate 192)?
db1989
post Apr 18 2014, 18:41
Post #26





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 5275
Joined: 23-June 06
Member No.: 32180



and Iím not sure why weíre spending time debating the philosophy of which pirate used hypothetically better encoding settings
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mach-X
post Apr 18 2014, 21:25
Post #27





Group: Members
Posts: 269
Joined: 29-July 12
From: Windsor, On, Ca
Member No.: 101859



While probably pirated, there is actually no real evidence of it in the OP.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
db1989
post Apr 18 2014, 21:56
Post #28





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 5275
Joined: 23-June 06
Member No.: 32180



I guess, although the presence of multiple file types in the second archive indicates sloppiness on behalf of either whoever collected the warez or the store that sold the files. wink.gif

Anyway, itís not my wish to pillory anyone, but neither do I want the site to be a service for judging othersí downloads Ė especially if theyíre not kosher, but regardless of source, I donít see much merit in guessing which set of encoding parameters is better when none of us have the same set of ears as the OP.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th August 2014 - 07:06