IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
LAME 3.97b2, New beta release
rjamorim
post Nov 27 2005, 02:52
Post #1


Rarewares admin


Group: Members
Posts: 7515
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Brazil
Member No.: 81



Gabriel Bouvigne just commited LAME 3.97 beta 2 to the CVS repository.

Quoting him: "There are only a few changes compared to b1, so I think that we should be able to release 3.97 soon."

http://lame.sourceforge.net/

Binaries are available at RareWares.

This post has been edited by rjamorim: Nov 28 2005, 00:10


--------------------
Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
guruboolez
post Nov 27 2005, 02:59
Post #2





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 3474
Joined: 7-November 01
From: Strasbourg (France)
Member No.: 420



QUOTE (rjamorim @ Nov 27 2005, 02:52 AM)
Binaries should be available at RareWares soon.
*

Could someone wake up John33? laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rjamorim
post Nov 27 2005, 03:04
Post #3


Rarewares admin


Group: Members
Posts: 7515
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Brazil
Member No.: 81



Here's a stop-gap compile for win32 until John compiles proper, ICL-optimized binaries:

http://www.rarewares.org/rja/Lame-Win32-3.97b2.zip


--------------------
Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ysoya
post Nov 27 2005, 06:06
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 24-May 04
Member No.: 14290



I noticed slight modification on V5 ATHaa sensitivity.
from presets.c (line 370, 388)

Lame 3.97b1
V5 athaa_sensitivity = -16

Lame 3.97b2
V5 athaa_sensitivity = -12

This post has been edited by ysoya: Nov 27 2005, 06:07
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john33
post Nov 27 2005, 13:01
Post #5


xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 3760
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Bracknell, UK
Member No.: 111



The base compile is now at Rarewares MP3 page. The other compiles will follow. smile.gif

If I have understood communications on the lame-dev mailing list correctly, this beta may change a little later after Gabriel has backported some stuff from the CVS head (ie., the alpha).


--------------------
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kurtnoise
post Nov 27 2005, 13:28
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 326
Joined: 26-June 02
From: Aix-en-Provence
Member No.: 2400



AS switch has been reintroduced in the cli...good to know. smile.gif


--------------------
http://www.unite-video.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=5412 :: An overview of all lossless Audio Formats (in french language ;-)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jkml
post Nov 27 2005, 13:45
Post #7





Group: Members
Posts: 72
Joined: 11-November 01
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 437



QUOTE (john33 @ Nov 27 2005, 09:01 PM)
The base compile is now at Rarewares MP3 page. The other compiles will follow. smile.gif

If I have understood communications on the lame-dev mailing list correctly, this beta may change a little later after Gabriel has backported some stuff from the CVS head (ie., the alpha).
*


lameACM.acm of beta 2 is 181 KB while lameACM.acm of beta 1 is 269 KB. Is the size difference normal?

blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john33
post Nov 27 2005, 14:32
Post #8


xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 3760
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Bracknell, UK
Member No.: 111



QUOTE (jkml @ Nov 27 2005, 12:45 PM)
lameACM.acm of beta 2 is 181 KB while lameACM.acm of beta 1 is 269 KB.  Is the size difference normal?

blink.gif
*

The difference is due to the b2 ACM compile being an MSVC6 one rather than the ICL9.0 of b1. It seemed from the lame mailing lists that people were having difficulties with the ICL compile so I thought it was worth trying a standard VC6 version.


--------------------
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
5paz
post Nov 28 2005, 01:14
Post #9





Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 28-November 05
Member No.: 26047



Hi,
Is there a apt-key signature key for your debian RareWare repositories. I'm using sid and I can just use --allow-unauthenticated with apt-get but I like to use aptitude and it just looks ugly blink.gif with all those U's splattered all over the place.
thanks
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jamesbaud
post Nov 28 2005, 04:25
Post #10





Group: Members
Posts: 107
Joined: 15-December 03
Member No.: 10468



QUOTE (john33 @ Nov 27 2005, 04:01 AM)
The base compile is now at Rarewares MP3 page. The other compiles will follow. smile.gif

If I have understood communications on the lame-dev mailing list correctly, this beta may change a little later after Gabriel has backported some stuff from the CVS head (ie., the alpha).
*


Looking forward to the version with the INI setup. biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
frodoontop
post Nov 28 2005, 10:34
Post #11





Group: Members
Posts: 131
Joined: 6-March 03
Member No.: 5359



Another step towards a stable new lame version smile.gif I'm looking forward to that, since all linux distributions will update lame too.

I know, I could compile it myself, but since I'm rather lazy... tongue.gif


--------------------
A secure audio ripper for linux: code.google.com/p/rubyripper
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john33
post Nov 28 2005, 11:12
Post #12


xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 3760
Joined: 30-September 01
From: Bracknell, UK
Member No.: 111



I will post a 'final' beta, plus derivative compiles, once the beta 2 version is announced at Sourceforge. Only then can we be sure that we have the full beta 2 release. wink.gif


--------------------
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jaybeee
post Nov 28 2005, 13:13
Post #13





Group: Members
Posts: 410
Joined: 20-October 04
From: UK
Member No.: 17750



QUOTE (rjamorim @ Nov 27 2005, 01:52 AM)
Quoting him: "There are only a few changes compared to b1, so I think that we should be able to release 3.97 soon."
*

I think it's always useful to detail the changes made for any software update.
I'm sure it's detailed in the lame cvs (somewhere), but since you went to the effort to tell us about the update, it would've been nice to have stated the changes made in the same post. Or maybe Gabriel could/should do that?


--------------------
http://www.health4ni.com/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Digga
post Nov 28 2005, 13:26
Post #14





Group: Members
Posts: 1047
Joined: 28-June 03
From: on the dock of the bay
Member No.: 7423



QUOTE (jaybeee @ Nov 28 2005, 01:13 PM)
I think it's always useful to detail the changes made for any software update.
I'm sure it's detailed in the lame cvs (somewhere), but since you went to the effort to tell us about the update, it would've been nice to have stated the changes made in the same post.  Or maybe Gabriel could/should do that?
I guess Roberto also doesn't know what the changes are (yet), otherwise he probably would have written them down.
I'll glady see a newsflash with just some notes or brief descriptions rather than no news at all as far as I am concerned wink.gif


--------------------
Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jaybeee
post Nov 28 2005, 13:32
Post #15





Group: Members
Posts: 410
Joined: 20-October 04
From: UK
Member No.: 17750



QUOTE (Digga @ Nov 28 2005, 12:26 PM)
I'll glady see a newsflash with just some notes or brief descriptions rather than no news at all as far as I am concerned  wink.gif
*

Agree, and I'm not saying we shouldn't have had any update. Thanks to Roberto for posting. Just a prompt really for someone to update it with the changes that's all biggrin.gif


--------------------
http://www.health4ni.com/
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alex B
post Nov 28 2005, 13:36
Post #16





Group: Members
Posts: 1303
Joined: 14-September 05
From: Helsinki, Finland
Member No.: 24472



From another thread:

QUOTE (markanini @ Nov 28 2005, 03:50 AM)
@halb27:
You may find the information here of intrest to you:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*che...y.html?rev=HEAD

QUOTE
LAME 3.97 beta 2  November 26 2005

    * Gabriel Bouvigne:
          o Fixed an initialization error when input is not using a standard sampling frequency
          o Fixed a possible assertion failure in very low bitrate encoding
          o Slight change regarding ATH adjustment with V5
          o Reinstated bit reservoir for 320kbps CBR
          o ReplayGain analysis should now be faster when encountering silent parts
    * Takehiro Tominaga:
          o Fixed a possible link problem of assembly code
*


--------------------
http://listening-tests.freetzi.com
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
halb27
post Nov 28 2005, 14:12
Post #17





Group: Members
Posts: 2435
Joined: 9-October 05
From: Dormagen, Germany
Member No.: 25015



QUOTE (Alex B @ Nov 28 2005, 02:36 PM)
@halb27:  .... Reinstated bit reservoir for 320kbps CBR  ...
*

Thank you, grreat news.


--------------------
lame3100m -V1 --insane-factor 0.75
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
burnett_s
post Nov 28 2005, 15:28
Post #18





Group: Members
Posts: 97
Joined: 19-June 03
From: ARG
Member No.: 7291



Since LAME 3.97 beta 2 is out, should we use it instead of LAME 3.97 beta 1 or not yet ?

QUOTE
LAME 3.97 beta 2  November 26 2005
Gabriel Bouvigne:
- Fixed an initialization error when input is not using a standard sampling frequency
- Fixed a possible assertion failure in very low bitrate encoding
- Slight change regarding ATH adjustment with V5
- Reinstated bit reservoir for 320kbps CBR
Takehiro Tominaga:
- Fixed a possible link problem of assembly code


Gr.


--------------------
Greetings
Sonny Burnett.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChiGung
post Nov 28 2005, 15:45
Post #19





Group: Members
Posts: 439
Joined: 9-February 05
From: county down
Member No.: 19713



QUOTE (halb27 @ Nov 28 2005, 01:12 PM)
QUOTE (Alex B @ Nov 28 2005, 02:36 PM)
@halb27:  .... Reinstated bit reservoir for 320kbps CBR  ...
*

Thank you, grreat news.
*


Congratulations Halb! and +Respect to Gabriel for hacking it out with you and taking it onboard smile.gif


--------------------
no conscience > no custom
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
user
post Nov 28 2005, 15:48
Post #20





Group: Members
Posts: 873
Joined: 12-October 01
From: the great wide open
Member No.: 277



I suggest to change the recommnded settings topic & recommnded compiles topic, to recommend now 3.97b2 inseatd of 3.97b1.


--------------------
www.High-Quality.ch.vu -- High Quality Audio Archiving Tutorials
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Echizen
post Nov 28 2005, 16:04
Post #21





Group: Members
Posts: 70
Joined: 22-April 03
Member No.: 6122



QUOTE (user @ Nov 28 2005, 04:48 PM)
I suggest to change the recommnded settings topic & recommnded compiles topic, to recommend now 3.97b2 inseatd of 3.97b1.
*


Yes, we should do that.


(User: Please answer to my PMs next time.)

This post has been edited by Echizen: Nov 28 2005, 16:04
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
user
post Nov 28 2005, 16:39
Post #22





Group: Members
Posts: 873
Joined: 12-October 01
From: the great wide open
Member No.: 277



QUOTE (Echizen @ Nov 28 2005, 04:04 PM)
(User: Please answer to my PMs next time.)
*


Sorry, I answered, when there was time. Unfortunately, we aren't paid for HA-work wink.gif Changes from various persons were suggested, so I decided to watch the daily or even hourly proposed changes. Now it has settled down a bit, and I have time again for the moment to work on mp3, but the topic is closed and i cannot edit. If the topic is opened for edition of the lame 3.97b2, I will look for incorporation of layout/wording changes, also.


--------------------
www.High-Quality.ch.vu -- High Quality Audio Archiving Tutorials
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
CiTay
post Nov 28 2005, 17:46
Post #23


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 2378
Joined: 22-September 01
Member No.: 3



QUOTE (user @ Nov 28 2005, 04:39 PM)
If the topic is opened for edition of the lame 3.97b2, I will look for incorporation of layout/wording changes, also.
*


Okay, opened. Please take note of the changes you make so it can be edited in the Wiki as well.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Synaptic Line No...
post Nov 28 2005, 18:14
Post #24





Group: Members
Posts: 92
Joined: 19-May 05
Member No.: 22137



o ReplayGain analysis should now be faster when encountering silent parts

Maybe related, but awhile ago I created a silent sound file in soundforge and encoded it with: mppenc, LAME, and Nero AAC.
I noticed that LAME took approximately 7x longer to encode pure silence than the others. I thought it was a little strange.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
CiTay
post Nov 28 2005, 20:09
Post #25


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 2378
Joined: 22-September 01
Member No.: 3



QUOTE (Synaptic Line Noise @ Nov 28 2005, 06:14 PM)
          o ReplayGain analysis should now be faster when encountering silent parts

Maybe related, but awhile ago I created a silent sound file in soundforge and encoded it with: mppenc, LAME, and Nero AAC.
I noticed that LAME took approximately 7x longer to encode pure silence than the others. I thought it was a little strange.
*


Hehe, maybe it's those denormals again?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th September 2014 - 19:51